POLITICS &
PERSONALITY/POLITICAL
PSYCHOLOGY
DR. ARNOLD LEDER
Political Science 4335
The online version of this syllabus can be
accessed @
http://www.arnoldleder.com/4335.htm.
Password protected materials for this course can
be
viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.html.
Scroll
to the section on "Political Psychology". Password
and user name for access will be provided to students in the
course. For links to web syllabi for other
courses taught by
Dr. Leder see: http://www.arnoldleder.com/.
Department Of Political Science/Texas State
University
http://www.polisci.txstate.edu/
UAC/Undergraduate Academic Center 355; Telephone number:
(512) 245-2143; Fax number: (512) 245-7815
Liberal Arts Computer Lab: UAC/Undergraduate
Academic Center 440;
Website: http://www.polisci.txstate.edu/resources/computer-lab.html
Office: UCA 363
Office Hours: MWF 8:00-8:50 a.m.,
MW 11:00-11:50 a.m. & by
appointment
Texas
State University Academic Calendar
Texas State University Final Exam
Schedule
Selected Web Resources For Texas State
University
Texas State
University Library
Locating
Periodicals @ Texas State University Library
Selected
Web Resources For Political
Science
The
Ultimate Political Science Links Page
Political Psychology Resources
& University Programs
A partial list
of Political
Psychology resources & university programs is provided at the end of this syllabus.
COURSE ORGANIZATION & STUDENT
RESPONSIBILITIES
Please see: Academic
Honesty Statement for Texas State University @ http://www.txstate.edu/effective/upps/upps-07-10-01.html.
An excerpt
from
this statement
can be found at the end of this syllabus.
Class Participation, Oral Presentations,
Exams,
Papers, Grades
1. This course will be conducted as a seminar.
Students must attend every class meeting and be prepared to discuss
assigned
readings and other materials. Active participation in class
discussion
is essential. Course grades will be determined by oral
presentations,
class participation, written papers, and exams
2. Determinants of Course Grade: Oral Reports &
Presentations 25%/ Seminar Participation 15%/ Essay Exams/Papers 60%
Attendance
1. Two (2) unexcused absences are permitted.
Students with three (3) unexcused absences will have their course grade
lowered by one letter grade. Students who have four (4) unexcused
absences will have their course grade lowered by two letter
grades.
No absences beyond four (4) for any reason are permitted.
Any student who has more than four
absences is likely to fail the
course
and, therefore, should withdraw from the course.
2. The instructor for the course is not responsible
for bringing students who have missed class "up-to-date" on missed
material.
Each student has the responsibility to remain current with respect to
class
material.
Note On Course &
Syllabus
Materials: Students
may find books, articles, links, websites, and
other materials provided in this syllabus useful and of interest. Their
listing in this syllabus, including those which are required and
recommended,
does not necessarily indicate endorsement of or agreement with any
views
or positions on any issues found in these materials, websites, or on
other
sites to which they may provide links.
Note On Access To Articles: Access
to
articles through the Texas State University Library, @ Locating
Periodicals @ Texas State University Library
available to all
Texas
State University students, requires a valid User Name and a
Password.
Many of the links in this syllabus provide direct access to the article.
Password Protected Materials: Some
materials on this web syllabus are password protected and are directly
accessible @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.html.
These
materials are for student use. The password will be provided to
students
in the course.
COURSE DESCRIPTION
This course is an introduction to the relationship between
political behavior and human motivation. Topics covered include:
conceptual and methodological concerns; psychological perspectives and
political theory; power and personality; the psychological burdens of
freedom and their relationship to authority and individual will;
illusion, reality, and the political order; symbols and political
quiescence; the psychology of empire; and psychological insights into
political behavior offered by fiction and film.
PURPOSE OF COURSE
The purpose of this course is to
provide an additional dimension to the student's understanding of the
universe
of politics. To the rational, and widely taken for granted, model of
political
behavior, the spirit of which is nicely captured by Harold Lasswell's
well
known definition of politics as "who gets what, when, how", this course
offers an alternative model of the universe of politics. It is a
model of political behavior which examines the "irrational", the world
of human emotions and human personality, as they relate to and
influence
this behavior. Political Psychology, as it is generally known, is
a well established field in the discipline of Political Science.
REQUIRED
BOOKS
Fyodor
Dostoevsky/The Brothers Karamazov (1880/classic)
-In this novel the chapter
entitled
The
Grand Inquisitor (about 20 pages)
Sigmund
Freud/Civilization & Its Discontents (1930/classic)
Erich
Fromm/Escape From Freedom (1941/classic)
Eric
Hoffer/The True Believer: Thoughts On The Nature Of Mass Movements
(1951/classic)
Richard
Hofstadter/The Paranoid Style In American
Politics (Harvard Univ. Press 1996/Original Publication 1952)
O.Mannoni/Prospero
& Caliban: The Psychology Of Colonization (Univ. of
Michigan-AnnArbor paperback
2001/Original French Publication 1948)
Mannoni's, Prospero
& Caliban is a
modern classic - whose premise has been questioned.
RECOMMENDED
BOOK
Murray
Edelman/Symbols & Political Quiescence (Irvington
Publishers-Reprint Series in Political Science 1993)
FILMS
"The Caine Mutiny" Caine
Mutiny, The (1954) [2hrs. 5min.] The
Caine Mutiny1954) DVD
ReviewThe Caine Mutiny
This film is based on the novel
HermanWouk/The
Caine Mutiny
(1951) (Winner Of Pulitzer Prize)
"The Prime of Miss Jean Brody" The Prime
of Miss Jean Brodie (1969)
[1hr. 55min.]
This film is based on the novel
Muriel
Spark/The Prime Of Miss Jean Brodie
(1961)
"The Matrix" The
Matrix (1999)
[2hrs. 16min.]
"A Passage To India" A
Passage To India (1985) [2hrs. 43 min.]
[Based on the novel E.
M. Forster/A Passage To India (1924)]
The
Manchurian Candidate (1962) [2hrs. 9 min.] A
film classic on conspiracy thinking.
The
Crucible (1996) [2hrs. 2 min.] A
favorite
of many secondary school teachers and students of the McCarthy era
(1950's) in
the
U.S.
The Lives of Others
(2006 German with English subtitles)
[2hrs. 18min.]
"The Brothers Karamazov" The Brothers
Karamazov (1958) [2hrs. 25 min.]
"All About Eve" All_About_Eve (1950)
[2hrs. 38 min.]
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Course Title: Politics &
Personality/Political
Psychology
Overview Of Course
Topics
I.
Introduction
II. Freud
- Instinctual
Drives & Civilization
III.
Personality
& Politics
IV.
Political Leaders
& Followers
V.
The Political Psychology of
Terrorism
VI.
Dostoevsky -
Religion, Authority, Freedom, & Individual Will
VII.
The Matrix:
Illusion, Reality, & Freedom
VIII.
Edelman
- Symbols, Symbolic Reassurance, And Political Quiescence
IX. The Paranoid Style & Conspiracy Thinking
X.
The Psychology
Of Empire
TOPICS FOR
READING, ORAL &
WRITTEN
REPORTS, & DISCUSSION
I.
Introduction
Readings: DiRenzo, "Perspectives
on Personality and Political Behavior"
in Gordon
J. DiRenzo (ed.)/Personality & Politics
(1974), pp. 3-26.
The DiRenzo essay will be provided to students.
II. Freud -
Instinctual
Drives & Civilization
A view of "human nature" in
ancient
Athens:
"Then, with the ordinary conventions of civilized
life thrown into confusion,human nature, always ready to
offend(emphasis
added) even where laws exist, showed itself proudly in its true
colours,
as something incapable of controlling passion, insubordinate to
the
idea of justice, the enemy to anything superior to itself..."
These are the observations of
Thucydides
[c. 460 - 400 BCE], the ancient Greek historian and student of
political
behavior, with regard to "The Civil War In Corcyra 427 [BCE]" in:
Thucydides,
History
Of The Peloponnesian War (Rex Warner Translation/Introduction &
Notes By M. I. Finley/Penguin Classics/1972), p. 245.
Readings: Freud, Civilization
And Its Discontents, the entire monograph.
All students in this course should download and print for their
personal use a hard copy of "A Partial Glossary Of Freud". This glossary can be accessed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.html.
Scroll
to the section on "Political Psychology" and look for "A
Partial Glossary Of Freud". This location is password
protected.
Password
and user name for access will be provided to students in the
course.
Wilfred
M. McClay/The Moral Economy of Guilt/First Things, May 2011, No. 213.
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State University
User Name and password are required.
Abstract:
The article explores the contribution of cultural process in the
emergence of sense of guilt. According to the author, the advancement
in civilization contributed to the heightening of the sense of guilt
which made the people lose their happiness. He adds that religions in
the world are trying to save the people from the sin of guilt. He
stresses that the ability to feel guilt is one of the attributes of
people. He also mentions the therapeutic unreality of guilt, which can
be something illusory and omnipresent and the concept of forgiveness.
"In his grand and gloomy book Civilization
and Its Discontents, Sigmund
Freud identified the tenacious
sense of guilt as the most important
problem in the development of civilization. In fact, he
continued, it seems that the price
we pay for our advance in civilization is a loss of happiness through
the heightening of the sense of guilt." (boldface added)
Dinah M.
Mendes, "Totem and Tefillin", Azure, No. 44, Spring 2011. Review
of: Arnold
D. Richards (ed.), The Jewish World
of Sigmund Freud: Essays on
Cultural Roots and the Problem of Religious Identity (McFarland
2010).
Russell
Jacoby/Bloodlust: Why we should fear our neighbors more than
strangers/The Chronicle Review, March 27, 2011.
Texas State University Library permalink. A valid Texas State
University User Name and password are required for access.
"The proposition that violence derives from kith and kin overturns a
core liberal belief that we assault and are assaulted by those who are
strangers to us. If that were so, the solution would be at hand: Get to
know the stranger. Talk with the stranger. Reach out. The cure for
violence is better communication, perhaps better education. Study
foreign cultures and peoples. Unfortunately, however, our brother, our
neighbor, enrages us precisely because we understand him. Cain knew his
brother—he "talked with Abel his brother"—and slew him afterward.
...
We don't like this truth. We prefer to fear strangers. We like to
believe that fundamental differences pit people against one another,
that world hostilities are driven by antagonistic principles about how
society should be constituted.
...
We hate the neighbor we are enjoined
to love. Why? Why do small
disparities between people provoke greater hatred than the large ones?
Perhaps the work of Freud helps chart the underground sources of
fratricidal violence. Freud introduced the phrase the narcissism of
minor differences to describe
this phenomenon. He noted that it is
precisely the little dissimilarities in persons who are otherwise alike
that arouse feelings of strangeness and enmity between them."
(Freud's words are in italics.) [Boldface added.]
III.
Personality
& Politics
1.
Lasswell - Power
&
Personality
Readings:
Harold Lasswell,
"The Political Personality" in Gordon
J. DiRenzo (ed.)/Personality & Politics
(1974), pp. 38-54.
The Lasswell article will be provided to students.
Alexander
L. George, Power as a Compensatory Value for Political Leaders/Journal
of Social Issues, July 1968, Vol. 24, No. 3. (pdf)
Texas State University Library permalink. A valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
Recommended: Harold
D. Lasswell/Psychopathology And Politics (1930)
Film:
"All About Eve" All_About_Eve (1950)
[2hrs. 38 min.]
Film clip from "All
About Eve":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnr3AMCmJ3A
2. Political Orientation,
Personality, & Values
a.
Political
Orientation: How
Liberals
& Conservatives Think
Readings:
Patricia Cohen/Across the Great
Divide: Investigating Links Between Personality and Politics/NYT
February 12, 2007
Herbert
McClosky,
"Conservatism and Personality", American Political Science Review,
March, 1958, Vol. 52, No. 1.
Texas State University permalink. A valid
Texas State University User Name and
password are required for access.
George
Lakoff/The Worldview Problem For American Politics - an excerpt
from George
Lakoff/Moral Politics:How Liberals & Conservatives Think
(Univ. Of Chicago 2002)
Noam
Scheiber, "Wooden Frame: Is George Lakoff Misleading Democrats?", The New
Republic, May
23 2005.
Texas State University permalink. A valid Texas
State University User Name and
password are required for access.
For background information on George Lakoff
and the
scholarly disputes in which he has been involved, see:
Evan
R. Goldstein, "Who Framed George Lakoff?", Chronicle of Higher Education,
August 15, 2008, Vol. 54, Issue 49, pp. B6-B9.
Texas State University permalink. A valid Texas
State University User Name and
password are required for access.
Sue
Halperin, "Mind Control & the Internet", The New York Review of
Books, June 23, 2011, Vol. LVIII, No. 11, pp. 33-35.
A review essay on: World Wide Mind: The Coming Integration of Humanity,
Machines, and the Internet
by Michael Chorost (Free
Press 2011); The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You
by Eli Pariser (Penguin
2011);
You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto
by Jaron Lanier (Vintage
2010).
From the Essay:
"Among the many insidious consequences of this individualization
is that by tailoring the information you receive to the algorithm’s
perception of who you are, a perception that it constructs out of
fifty-seven variables, Google directs you to material that is most
likely to reinforce your own worldview, ideology, and assumptions.
Pariser suggests, for example, that a search for proof about climate
change will turn up different results for an environmental activist
than it would for an oil company executive and, one assumes, a
different result for a person whom the algorithm understands to be a
Democrat than for one it supposes to be a Republican. (One need not
declare a party affiliation per se—the algorithm will prise this out.)
In this way, the Internet, which isn’t the press, but often functions
like the press by disseminating news and information, begins to cut us
off from dissenting opinion and conflicting points of view, all the
while seeming to be neutral and objective and unencumbered by the kind
of bias inherent in, and embraced by, say, the The Weekly Standard or The Nation.
..,.
... when ideology drives the dissemination of information, knowledge is
compromised.
...
This is Pariser’s point exactly, and his concern: that by having our own ideas bounce back at us,
we inadvertently indoctrinate ourselves with our own ideas.
'Democracy requires citizens to see things from one another’s point of
view, but instead we’re more and more enclosed in our own bubbles,' he
writes. 'Democracy requires a reliance on shared facts; instead we’re
being offered parallel but separate universes.'
(boldface added)
...
The 'hive mind' created through our electronic connections
necessarily obviates the individual—indeed, that’s what makes it a
collective consciousness. Anonymity, which flourishes where there is no
individual accountability, is one of its key features, and behind it,
meanness, antipathy, and cruelty have a tendency to rush right in."
Steven
Pinker/The Moral Instinct/NYT Sunday Magazine January 13, 2008
"The ranking and placement of moral spheres also divides the
cultures
of
liberals and conservatives in the United States. Many bones of
contention, like homosexuality, atheism and one-parent families from
the right, or racial imbalances, sweatshops and executive pay from the
left, reflect different weightings of the spheres. In a large Web
survey, Haidt found that liberals put a lopsided moral weight on harm
and fairness while playing down group loyalty, authority and purity.
Conservatives instead place a moderately high weight on all five. It’s
not surprising that each side thinks it is driven by lofty ethical
values and that the other side is base and unprincipled.
... So a biological
understanding of the moral sense does not entail that people are
calculating maximizers of their genes or self-interest. But where does
it leave the concept of morality itself?
... Here is the worry. The
scientific outlook has taught us that some parts of our subjective
experience are products of our biological makeup and have no objective
counterpart in the world. The qualitative difference between red and
green, the tastiness of fruit and foulness of carrion, the scariness of
heights and prettiness of flowers are design features of our common
nervous system, and if our species had evolved in a different ecosystem
or if we were missing a few genes, our reactions could go the other
way. Now, if the distinction between right and wrong is also a product
of brain wiring, why should we believe it is any more real than the
distinction between red and green? And if it is just a collective
hallucination, how could we argue that evils like genocide and slavery
are wrong for everyone, rather than just distasteful to us?"
John
T. Jost/The End of the End of Ideology/American Psychologist, Vol. 61
(7), October 2006, pp. 651-670.
Texas State University Library permalink. A valid Texas State
University User Name and password are required for access.
A
shorter version of this article can be accessed @ http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/10/ideology-is-back-and-the-divides-are-still-deep/.
b. Values, Personality, &
Political Choice
G.
V. Caprara, S. Schwartz, C. Capanna, M. Vecchione, C.
Barbaranelli/Personality and Politics: Values, Traits, and Political
Choice, Political Psychology, February 2006, Vol. 27, Issue 1. (pdf)
Texas State University Library permalink. A valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
Abstract
Voters' political choices have presumably come to depend
on their personal preferences and less on their social characteristics
in Western democracies. We examine two aspects of personality
that may influence political choice, traits, and personal values, ...
Data from 3044 voters for the major coalitions in the Italian national
election of 2001 showed that supporters of the two coalitions differed
in traits and values ... values explained substantial variance in past
and future voting and in change of political choice, trumping
personality traits. ...
Bryan
Caplan/The Myth of the Rational
Voter: Why Voters
Choose Bad Policies (Princeton 2007)
Read the Introduction
to this book.
From the Introduction:
"This book develops an alternative story of how democracy fails.
The
central idea is that voters are worse
than ignorant; they are, in a
word, irrational—and vote accordingly. Economists and cognitive
psychologists usually presume that everyone 'processes information' to
the best of his ability. Yet common sense tells us that
emotion and ideology—not just the facts or their
'processing'—powerfully sway human judgment. Protectionist thinking is
hard to uproot because it feels good. When people vote under
the influence of false beliefs that feel good, democracy persistently
delivers bad policies. As an old computer programming slogan goes,
GIGO—Garbage in, garbage out.
... This book has three conjoined themes. The first: Doubts about the
rationality of voters are empirically justified. The second: Voter
irrationality is precisely what economic theory implies once we adopt
introspectively plausible assumptions about human motivation. The
third: Voter irrationality is the key to a realistic picture of
democracy.
... In the naive public-interest view, democracy works
because it does what voters want. In the view of most democracy
skeptics, it fails because it does not do what voters want. In my view,
democracy fails because it does what voters want. In economic jargon,
democracy has a built-in externality.
An irrational voter does not hurt only himself. He also hurts everyone
who is, as a result of his irrationality, more likely to live under
misguided policies. Since most of the cost of voter irrationality is
external—paid for by other people, why not indulge? If enough voters
think this way, socially injurious policies win by popular
demand." (boldface added)
For an overview of the basic ideas that inform Bryan Caplan's much
discussed book, see: Bryan
CaplanThe Myth of the Rational Voter/Essay @ cato-unbound.org/November
6, 2007
See also this review of Bryan Caplan's book:
Louis
Menand/Fractured
Franchise:Are the wrong people voting?/The New Yorker July 9, 2007
"Caplan rejects the assumption that voters pay no attention to
politics
and have no real views. He thinks that voters do have views, and that
they are, basically, prejudices. He calls these views irrational,
because, once they are translated into policy, they make everyone worse
off. People not only hold irrational views, he thinks; they like
their irrational views. In the language of economics, they have demand for irrationality curves:
they will give up y amount of wealth in order to consume x
amount of irrationality. Since voting carries no cost, people are free
to be as irrational as they like. They can ignore the consequences,
just as the herdsman can ignore the consequences of putting one more
cow on the public pasture. Voting is
not a slight variation on
shopping, as Caplan puts it. Shoppers
have incentives to be rational.
Voters do not.”
D. Sunshine
Hillygus & Todd G. Shields/The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in
Presidential Campaigns (Princeton University Press 2008)
Read
Chapter 1.
"Our theory of the persuadable voter challenges three widespread
myths
about contemporary American politics. First, there is a popular
perception that recent presidential candidates have campaigned on
divisive issues as a way to fire up their core partisan base.
... Academic works have similarly
concluded that candidates will be willing to take extreme positions on
controversial issues to pander to their partisan base—either because
they need to win party primaries or to obtain the campaign
contributions and other resources necessary to run for office.
In
contrast, we argue that divisive issues are often used to appeal to
persuadable voters, often from the opposing partisan camp.
The second myth we take on in this book is the widespread view that
the polarization we observe in Washington has led to or has followed
similar polarization in the electorate. The reality is that in a
complex and pluralistic society, political parties are inherently
coalitions of diverse individuals. The choice of only two major parties
ensures that some partisans will be incongruent on some issues, thereby
creating policy cleavages within the party coalitions. We argue that
these cross-pressures between partisan loyalties and policy preferences
have clear implications for the behavior of both voters and candidates
in the campaign.
Cross-pressured partisans are willing to
reassess their expected support for their party’s nominee if they come
to believe that an issue about which they disagree with their party is
at stake in the election. These voters might find the salience of a
conflicting issue increased by real-world events or personal
experiences, but a political campaign can also activate a policy
disagreement by highlighting the candidates’ differences on the issue
and calling attention to one’s own party’s failings and the
opposition’s virtues on the issue.
Finally, the third myth
that we challenge in our analysis is the enduring conventional wisdom
that persuadable voters are the least admirable segment of the
electorate—poorly informed and lacking in policy attitudes. The
prevailing perception about the persuadable segment of the electorate
is that 'its level of information is low, its sense of political
involvement is slight, its level of political participation is not
high.'7 It is thought that these muddled voters make up
their minds on the basis of nonpolicy considerations, like candidate
personality, charisma, and the 'guy you’d wanna drink a beer with'
criteria. In contrast, our theory suggests that policy issues are often
central to how persuadable voters make up their minds. To be clear,
this book is not a polemical account of an American populace composed
of ideal citizens highly engaged and fully informed across all policy
domains. Rather, we argue simply that for those voters who find
themselves at odds with their party nominee it is the campaign that
often helps to determine whether partisan loyalties or issue
preferences are given greater weight in their vote decision".
Lera
Boroditsky/How Does Our Language Shape The Way We
Think?/www.edge.org/June 12, 2009
"For a long time, the idea that language might shape thought was
considered at best untestable and more often simply wrong. Research in
my labs at Stanford University and at MIT has helped reopen this
question. We have collected data around the world: from China, Greece,
Chile, Indonesia, Russia, and Aboriginal Australia. What we have
learned is that people who speak different languages do indeed think
differently and that even flukes of grammar can profoundly
affect how
we see the world. Language is a uniquely human gift, central to our
experience of being human. Appreciating its role in constructing our
mental lives brings us one step closer to understanding the very nature
of humanity." (boldface added)
Return
to Top
Return
to Topics
IV.
Political Leaders
& Followers
1. Personality of Leaders
& Political Behavior
a. Political Leaders
Readings:
(Revisited) Lasswell,
"The Political Personality"; George, "Power as a Compensatory Value for
Political Leaders".
b. Followers
Readings:
Eric Hoffer, The True Believer,
the entire
book.
Tim
Madigan, "The True Believer Revisited", Philosophy Now, December
2001-January 2002 @ bartoncii.xanga.com/581648156/more-on-eric-hoffer-the-true-believer-revisited/.
On kitsch:
http://www.denisdutton.com/kitsch_macmillan.htm
A
Guide To Kitsch: A Definition/World of Kitsch.com
World
of kitsch.com
__________________________________________________
Aileen Kelly, "Why They Believed in Stalin", The New York Review of Books,
April 26, 2007, Vol. LIV, No. 7, pp. 58-62. A review essay on Tear Off the Masks: Identity and
Imposture in Twentieth-Century Russia (Princeton University
Press, 2007) by Sheila Fitzpatrick and Revolution on My
Mind: Writing a Diary Under Stalin (Harvard University Press 2007)
by Jochen Hellbeck.
The Kelly article can be viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.html.
Scroll
to the section on "Political Psychology" and
look for "Aileen Kelly: Why They Believed in Stalin". This
location is password
protected.
Password
and user name for access will be provided to students in the
course.
"... the Soviet notion of selfhood had deep roots in a different
cultural tradition which did not recognize the same dichotomy of public
and private. Lack of historical perspective is a major flaw in
Fitzpatrick's book. The "new man" was not, as Fitzpatrick implies, a
concept invented by the Soviet regime. It was central to a tradition of
introspection and moral self-perfecting that arose in the early
nineteenth century as a response to the dilemma of the Russian
intelligentsia
whose talents were frustrated in their benighted country, and whose
longing for personal fulfillment was combined with a strong commitment
to social justice. From Enlightenment rationalism, German romantic
philosophy, and French utopian socialism many educated Russians
absorbed a vision of history as a collective process leading to the
fullest self-realization of man through the healing of all painful
divisions between individuals and the social whole.
... In the worst years of Stalinism many maintained their faith in the
Party's infallibility by developing a dual consciousness. As Stephen
Kotkin explains, for Soviet citizens the discrepancies between lived
experience and revolutionary ideology based ultimately on theory seem
to have given rise to a dual reality: life could resemble 'a split
existence: sometimes in one truth, sometimes in the other.' Even when
theoretical 'truth' was contradicted by common sense, it still formed
an integral part of everyday existence; without an understanding of it,
citizens found it impossible to know what was permitted and what not.
But acceptance of the truthfulness of the revolutionary truth also
fulfilled another function: 'it was also,' Kotkin writes, 'a way to
transcend the pettiness of daily life, to see the whole picture, to
relate mundane events to a larger design; it offered something to
strive for.' True
believers (boldface added) could explain away the worst excesses
of Stalinism by viewing
the present from the perspective of eschatological time. In this form
of secular religiosity, history, like Providence, was seen to move in
mysterious ways; when the goal was attained it would become clear that
policies and actions which now seemed objectionable or senseless all
had their place in the overall grand design.
... The diaries Hellbeck has selected are especially
significant for the light they shed on an aspect of the Soviet
mentality under Stalin which, as he notes, Western readers find
particularly challenging: the acceptance of violence in the service of
self-realization. We see at first hand the operation, chilling and
sometimes poignant, of the dual consciousness that allowed many to
accept the mass slaughter of collectivization and the Terror and to
justify the violence inflicted on them and those they cherished for
crimes they did not commit.
... His study adds an important
dimension to the work done by other
scholars to throw light on the psychological reasons behind the
collusion of moral idealists in the extreme violence of the Stalin
years. He concludes by
reminding us that the modes of thought that
encouraged Soviet citizens to accept violence in the service of
self-realization were not specific to the Soviet Union or the political
left. (boldface added) In the first half of the last
century the attraction of movements
promising fulfillment through an all-embracing worldview led
intellectuals across Europe such as Ernst Jünger and Georges Sorel
to extol the morally and aesthetically purifying effects of political
violence."
For a review of this book, see:
Karl Schlögel, 'Life has been
reborn', London
Review of Books, 16 August 2007. Karl Schlögel's
review essay may be accessed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.html.
Scroll
to the section on "Political Psychology" and
look for "Schlögel review of
Hellbeck book". This
location is password
protected.
Password
and user name for access will be provided to students in the
course.
For additional material on the issue of collaboration with
totalitarian regimes, see the Milan Kundera affair in
the Frankfurter
Allgemeine Zeitung of October 13, 2008.
"The book of betrayal under Communism has just gained another chapter,"
reports Karl-Peter Schwarz. "In March 1950, as a
student in Prague, the writer Milan Kundera informed on an
anti-Communist resistance activist. The victim, 22-year-old Miroslav
Dvoracek
was subsequently arrested and sentenced to 22-years in prison. The
State prosecutor at the time demanded the death sentence for
espionage." The young Czech historian, Adam Hradilek of Ustr,
who found the letter of denunciation with Kundera's signature in an
archive, describes the affair in a detailed report in the magazine
Respekt. The
Slovakian internet magazine Salon then published an English translation of the report. The article
reads like a sinister novel about love, betrayal, freedom,
Communism, heroism and failure. The commentary, by Respekt
editor-in-chief, Martin Simecka, is also available in English here.
For additional background on this story in
English, see:
Rachel
Donadio/Report Says Acclaimed Czech Writer (Milan Kundera) Informed on
a Supposed Spy/NYT October 13, 2008 and
Dan
Bilefsky/Accusation Against Writer Reopens Traumas of Czech Past/NYT
October 18, 2008.
Life appears to be imitating art in the drama
surrounding the accusation that Milan Kundera had denounced a Western
intelligence agent.
'On one level the reaction goes far beyond Mr. Kundera himself,
tapping
into gnawing discomfort in the Czech Republic about the extent of
collaboration during 41 years of Communist rule.
... This story is not just about Kundera, it is about the history of
the Czech Republic,” said Petr Tresnak, one of the authors of the
Respekt article. 'People in this country are overwhelmed and disgusted
by the number of people who collaborated with the regime, and this is a
very concrete example of what happened.'
... In 1991, the Czechs were among the first
Eastern-bloc countries to
introduce a law banning from public life those listed as agents or
informers in secret police reports. The law, Mr. Pehe contended, had
ensnared tens of thousands of people who may have been unwilling
collaborators.
'The reality is that the totalitarian regime
was constructed in such a
way that 99 percent of people cooperated in one way or another, and the
Kundera case helps them to feel morally absolved, like they are the
good guys and he was one of the baddies,' Mr. Pehe said."
David
Crossland/Painful Memories Of An East German Gulag/Der Spiegel April 6,
2009
"Mario Röllig is still struggling to get over his time in a
Stasi prison
while his jailers enjoy a peaceful retirement. Twenty years after the
fall of the Wall, East Germany's former political prisoners want more
recognition for their suffering -- and an end to Ostalgie." - See: the film The Lives of Others
(2006 German with English subtitles)
[2hrs. 18min.].
Films:
The Lives of Others
(2006 German with English subtitles)
[2hrs. 18min.]
Timothy Garton
Ash/The Stasi on Our Minds/The New York Review of Books, Vol. 54, No.
9, May 31, 2007
2. Crisis, Stress,
& Political Leadership
Films:
The Caine Mutiny, Caine
Mutiny, The (1954) The
Caine Mutiny1954)
DVD
Review The Caine Mutiny
This film is based on the novel
HermanWouk/The
Caine Mutiny
(1951, Winner Of Pulitzer Prize)
The Prime
of Miss Jean Brodie (1969)
Film clip from "The Prime of Miss Jean Brody":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m-3SgRKnB0
This film is based on the novel Muriel
Spark/The Prime Of Miss Jean Brodie
(1961)
James
Wood/ The Prime of Ms. Muriel Spark/Atlantic Monthly, November 2004,
Vol. 294, Issue 4.
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access
For an analysis of the life and works of
Muriel Spark, see: Roger
Kimball/Muriel Spark, 1918-2006/newcriterion.com/April 4, 2006
Readings:
Joel
Brodkin/The First Neoconservative: Herman Wouk, the Americanization of
the Holocaust, and the Rise of Neoconservatism/New Politics/Summer
2005/Vol.
X No. 3.
(See Brodkin's remarks on The
Caine
Mutiny.)
V. The Political Psychology
of
Terrorism
1. Psychological Sources of Terrorism
Readings:
Michael
J. Mazarr/The Psychological Sources of Islamic Terrorism/Policy Review,
June-July 2004, No. 125.
2. Suicide Bombers: Rationality, Culture, Structure, &
Psychological Profiles
Readings:
Mohammed
M. Hafez/Rationality, Culture, and Structure in the Making of Suicide
Bombers: A Preliminary Synthesis and Illustrative Case Study/Studies in
Conflict & Terrorism, March-April 2006, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 165-185.
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
Abstract
Suicidal violence involves three levels of analysis: individual
motivations, organizational strategies, and societal conflicts. Using
rationalist, culturalist, and structuralist approaches to contentious
politics, this article explores the intersection of rationality, norms,
and conflict in the making of extreme violence. The case of Palestinian
suicide bombers demonstrates the interdependence of the three
approaches to explaining suicidal violence. For individuals,
self-sacrifice is conceived as an act of personal redemption rooted in
religious morality and national salvation. For organizations, human
bombs provide strategic advantages in the context of asymmetrical
warfare. For collectivities, martyrs are venerated when three
conditions converge: (1) cultural norms encompass symbolic narratives
that honor martyrdom; (2) legitimate authorities acquiesce to extreme
violence; and (3) conflicts generate feelings of victimization and
threat by external enemies.
David
Lester, Abijou Yanf, Mark Lindsay, "Suicide Bombers: Are
Psychological Profiles Possible?"/Studies in Conflict &
Terrorism, Vol. 27, No.4, July-August 2004 (pdf)
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
Note: On some
browsers, it may be necessary or more convenient to save the article to
desktop as pdf with the extension .pdf following the title of the
article.
Abstract
Review of research on the
characteristics
of suicide
bombers.
Contrary to previous commentary, it is suggested
that
suicide bombers may share personality traits (such as the authoritarian
personality) that psychological profiles of suicide bombersmight be
feasible,
and that the suicide bombers may be characterized by the risk factors
that
increase the probability of suicide. Two assertions are common in
essays
on suicide bombers. The first is that suicide bombersdo not appear to
be
characterized by the risk factors that predict suicidal behavior... The
second is that psychological profiles of suicide bombers are not
possible...
This essay will argue that both assertions are certainly premature and
probably incorrect. Both of these tasks (identifying suicide risk
factors and constructing psychological profiles) require extensive
biographies
of the individuals involved.
3. The "Harun al-Rashid Motive": Disguised
Terrorists'
Desire To Reveal Their True Identities
Peter
Suedfeld, Harun al-Rashid and the Terrorists: Identity Concealed,
Identity Revealed/Political Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 3, June 2004.
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
Abstract
The assumption of false identities is a frequent
theme
in history, fiction, and current events. Spies and criminals are
among those who pretend to be other than they are, although the
strategy
is not restricted to them. Harun al-Rashid (763-809), medieval
Caliph
of Baghdad, was described in the Thousand and One Nights as disguising
himself in order to detect and punish evildoers. One distinctive
feature of his adventures is that at some point he threw off the
disguise
and revealed his true identity. This paper recounts similar
self-exposures
by spies and terrorists (including those of 9/11) in situations where
such
an act could spell disaster for them. It further explores a
number
of explanations for the "Harun al-Rashid motive", suggests a way to
measure
it and discusses ways in which conterterrorism agencies could build
upon
it for their own purposes.
For a possible example or variant of the Harun al-Rashid motive,
unrelated to terrorism or detection of evildoers, in the American
political arena, see:
William
Yardley/Alaska's New Senator Sees Change at Work/NYT December 5, 2008
"Crisp in his business suits and smooth in his delivery, the mayor
has more urban polish than many other elected officials in Alaska.
He
is a regular presence at events like mortgage bankers luncheons and
chamber of commerce gatherings; he
also likes to slip in stories about
standing in the supermarket aisle, commiserating about the high prices
with residents who may not know he is mayor. He says he seeks
out the
discounted day-old bread." (boldface added)
4. The Psychological Dimensions Of Prisoner Abuse
The Stanford
University Prison Abuse Experiment
(1971) and related links
Cass
Sunstein/The Thin Line/The New Republic, May 21, 2007, Vol. 236, No. 4,
183, pp. 51-55.
Cass Sunstein's essay is a review of the book The
Lucifer Effect: How Good People Can Turn Evil by Philip Zimbardo
(March, 2007).
"Why do human
beings commit despicable acts? One answer points to individual
dispositions; another answer emphasizes situational pressures. In 2005,
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice stressed the importance of
individual dispositions in describing terrorists as "simply evil people
who want to kill." Situationists reject this view. They believe that
horrible acts can be committed by perfectly normal people. The most
extreme situationists insist that in the right circumstances, almost
all of us might be led to commit atrocities. ... What emerges is a clear challenge to
the most ambitious claims for situationism, and a more complicated
understanding of the relationship between individual dispositions and
social situations. And there is a final point. Zimbardo shows that the
very assumption of a particular social role automatically conveys a
great deal of information about appropriate behavior: consider the
roles of nurse, first officer, and prison guard. But social roles are
not fixed. Nurses and first officers need not think that they should
always follow doctors and captains, and prison guards need not feel
free to brutalize prisoners. Perhaps the largest lesson of Zimbardo's
experiment involves the importance of ensuring that a constant sense of
moral responsibility is taken to be part of, rather than inconsistent
with, a wide range of social roles."
For a different perspective on the behavior of individuals under
certain conditions, including a
predisposition to altruistic behavior, see:
"Parochial Altruism"
'... the notion that people might prefer to
help strangers from their own
ethnic group over strangers from a different group ...'
Olivia
Judson/The Selfless Gene/The Atlantic/ October, 2007, Vol. 300, No. 3,
pp. 90-98.
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
Return
to Top
Return
to Topics
VI.
Dostoevsky
- Religion, Authority, Freedom, & Individual Will
Readings: Dostoevsky, The Grand Inquisitor
Film: "The Brothers Karamazov" The Brothers
Karamazov (1958)
Caitrin
Nicol/Brave New World at 75/The New Atlantis/No. 16, Spring 2007
"Huxley’s most famous novel, Brave New World, was published
in
1932, and the occasion of this seventy-fifth anniversary should lead us
to wonder about his peculiar description of how we understand the
future. We live in a time of biotechnological leaps forward that have
made the term “Brave New World” almost a reflex for commentators
worried we are rushing headlong toward a sterilized post-human society,
engineered to joyless joy. It is easy to imagine that we see the
shadows of our society in Huxley’s vision of the future. But could it
be that our insistence on seeing Huxley’s book as an exceedingly
successful prophecy actually prevents us from recognizing its real
insight? Is there a way for us to understand the book free of the great
distorting influence of our own times? We can do that only by reading
the book on its own terms, as
its
first readers did, and by letting ourselves be guided by the literary,
scientific, and cultural critics of Huxley’s day. In doing so, we may
glimpse afresh something of the meaning of Brave New World in
its author’s mind and time. ...
... This 'illusion of freedom' was cast into
a clearer light by a reviewer who discerned that the temptation to
sacrifice liberty to end suffering often becomes an attack on the
reality of the liberty itself. Rebecca West, a prominent novelist and
literary critic ... said Huxley had
'rewritten in terms of our age'
Dostoevsky’s famous parable of the
Grand Inquisitor from The
Brothers Karamazov—a 'symbolic
statement that every generation ought to read afresh.' (boldface
added)
...
By shifting the question from political
control to personal conscience, West’s reading anticipated the
decentralized way that many of the particular scientific and cultural
furnishings of Huxley’s world have made appearances in ours. ...
the separation of sex from procreation, and love from sex; the
consumption-saturated culture threatening to commodify the consumers;
the increasingly physico-chemical attempt to explain and treat a
troubled psyche—we did not need bureaucratic threats or hypnopaedic
repetitions to want these things, and in this sense Huxley profoundly
overestimated (or is it underestimated?) mankind, and his book may, in
the deepest sense, have gotten our present all wrong. We chose these
things ourselves, uncoerced by terror or war or social engineers. They
have been developed to respond to real human hurts and desires; and, as
might be expected of human choices, the results and motives have been
mixed."
Note: The text of
Brave New
World is accessible on the Web @ this location.
VII.
The
Matrix: Illusion, Reality, & Freedom
1. The Matrix
Film: The
Matrix (1999)
Readings:
Adam
Gopnik/The Unreal Thing:What's Wrong With The Matrix?/New Yorker, May
19, 2003, Vol. 79, Iss. 12; pg. 068.
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
John
Tierney/Our Lives, Controlled From Some Guy's Couch/NYT/August 14, 2007
(with links to related articles)
Ronald
Bailey/Will
Super Smart Artificial Intelligences Keep Humans Around As
Pets?/Reason/September 11, 2007
"By 2030, or by 2050 at the latest, will a super-smart artificial
intelligence decide to keep humans around as pets? Will it instead
choose to turn the entire Earth, including the messy organic bits like
us, into computronium? Or is there a third alternative?"
“The Rapture of the nerds"? John
Markoff/The Coming Superbrain (w/links to related materials)/NYT Week
in Review, Sunday, May 24, 2009
Artificial intelligence is back in fashion, which raises the question:
Will computer intelligence surpass our own
The
Matrix-Links To Reviews & Commentaries/brothersjudd.com
2. Erich Fromm -
Escape From Freedom
Readings:
Fromm, Escape From Freedom
Chapters 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, & Appendix.
Lakshmi
Chaudry/Mirror, Mirror On the Web/The Nation/January 29, 2007, Vol.
284 Issue 4, p19-22, 4p. (pdf)
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
Abstract:
The article discusses the obsession with being famous, a desire shared
by many of the generation born between 1970-2000, and expressed through
media such as MySpace.com, reality television, and Internet blogging.
Referred to as "micro-celebrity," the author contends that the craze to
be famous or recognized on a mass scale is fueled by ego-centrism and
self-focus instead of actual achievement.
Note Chaudry's observations on fame.
Recommended
The
Erich Fromm Society
Return
to Top
Return
to Topics
VIII.
Edelman
- Symbols, Symbolic Reassurance, And Political Quiescence
Recommended:
Murray
Edelman/Symbols & Political Quiescence (1993)
Murray
Edelman/Symbols and Political Quiescence/The American Political Science
Review, Vol. 54, No. 3, September, 1960, pp. 695-704.
(pdf)
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
Scroll to the article and click on pdf.
For a view that suggests a current example of the manipulation of
symbols designed to induce political quiescence, see: Patrick
Basham/Put Out This Tobacco Bill/NYT August 03, 2007.
Ward
Sutton/Reading Tea Leaves and Campaign Logos/slideshow/OPART/NYT
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Candidates on the 2008 presidential campaign trail work hard to project
a certain kind of image to the public.
Mike
McIntire/Nuclear Leaks And Response Tested Obama/NYT February 03, 2008
"When residents in
Illinois
voiced outrage two years ago upon
learning that the Exelon Corporation had not disclosed radioactive
leaks at one of its nuclear plants, the state’s freshman
senator, Barack Obama, took up
their cause.
... Mr. Obama scolded Exelon and
federal regulators for inaction and
introduced a bill to require all plant owners to notify state and local
authorities immediately of even small leaks.
... He has boasted of it on
the campaign trail, telling a crowd in Iowa in December that it was the
only nuclear legislation that I’ve passed.
'I just did that last year', he said, to murmurs of approval.
... A close look at the path his legislation took tells a very
different
story. While he initially fought to advance his bill, even holding up a
presidential nomination to try to force a hearing on it, Mr. Obama
eventually rewrote it to reflect changes sought by Senate Republicans,
Exelon and nuclear regulators. The new bill removed language mandating
prompt reporting and simply offered guidance to regulators, whom it
charged with addressing the issue of unreported leaks.
... Those revisions propelled the bill through a crucial committee.
But,
contrary to Mr. Obama’s comments in Iowa, it ultimately died amid
parliamentary wrangling in the full Senate.
... Asked why Mr. Obama had cited it as an accomplishment while
campaigning
for president, the campaign noted that after the senator introduced his
bill, nuclear plants started making such reports on a voluntary basis.
The campaign did not directly address the question of why Mr. Obama had
told Iowa voters that the legislation had passed.
... But eventually, Mr. Obama agreed to rewrite
the bill, and when the environment committee approved it in September
2006, he and his co-sponsors hailed it as a victory.
... In interviews over the past two weeks, Obama aides insisted that
the
revisions did not substantively alter the bill. In fact, it was left
drastically different.
... In place of the straightforward reporting requirements was new
language giving the nuclear commission two years to come up with its
own regulations. The bill said that the commission “shall consider” —
not require — immediate public notification, and also take into account
the findings of a task force it set up to study the tritium leaks. ...
... The rewritten bill also contained the new wording sought by Exelon
making it clear that state and local authorities would have no
regulatory oversight of nuclear power plants.
... In interviews last week, representatives of Exelon and the nuclear
commission said they were satisfied with the revised bill. The Nuclear
Energy Institute said it no longer opposed it but wanted additional
changes.
... The revised bill was never taken up in the full Senate, where
partisan parliamentary maneuvering resulted in a number of bills being
shelved before the 2006 session ended.
... Still, the legislation has come
in handy on the campaign trail. Last
May, in response to questions about
his ties to Exelon, Mr. Obama wrote
a letter to a Nevada newspaper citing the bill as evidence that he
stands up to powerful interests.
... 'When I learned that radioactive tritium had leaked out of an
Exelon
nuclear plant in Illinois,' he wrote, 'I led an effort in the Senate to
require utilities to notify the public of any unplanned release of
radioactive substances.'
... Last October, Mr. Obama reintroduced the bill, in its rewritten
form."
(boldface added)
Mark
Greif/The Hard Sell/NYT Sunday Book Review December 30, 2007 - an essay
on the publication of a new edition of: The Hidden Persuaders
by Vance Packard (1957).
For excerpts from the book, see: http://www.ditext.com/packard/toc.html
and Chapter 17 - Politics and the Image
Builders.
Samuel
G. Freedman/A Long Road From ‘Come by Here’ to ‘Kumbaya’/NYT November
20, 2010
"Conservative Republicans use the term to mock the Obama
administration as naïve. Liberals on the left wing of the Democratic
Party use it to chastise President
Obama
for trying to be bipartisan. The president and some of his top aides
use it as an example of what they say their policies are not.
Yet the word nobody wants to own, the all-purpose put-down of
the
political moment, has a meaningful, indeed proud, heritage that hardly
anyone seems to know or to honor. Only within black church circles can
one, to this day, still hear Come By
Here with the profundity that
Mr. Gordon did almost a century ago."
Lawrence
R. Jacobs and Robert Y. Shapiro/Politicians Don't Pander: Political
Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness (University of
Chicago Press, 2000)/Excerpt from pp. xi-xx.
Alvaro
Vargas llosa, "The Killing Machine" (On Che Guevara), The New Republic, July
11 2005. This essay is directly accessible @ http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1535.
Edward
Rothstein/The Power of Political Pratfalls (includes images &
videos)/NYT
October 13, 2008
"A bumbling president, a rube candidate,
a greedy politician — such are the caricatures of political life.
Whether accurate or not, they can be more powerful than any argument.
... Such is the strange influence of
caricature in politics. (boldface added)
... So what gives caricature its unusual power? Physically, caricature
typically takes a particular feature — a hairdo, a verbal tic, a hand
gesture, an accent — and exaggerates it, giving it such prominence that
we come to see the person in a new and different light.
... The
word comes from the Italian “caricare,” meaning “to overload.” Some
characteristic is heavily piled on: the elongated nose, the prominent
belly, the bulbous eyes. Caricature seems to have its earliest
associations with portraits that showed human subjects to be
transformed animals. This can be just a trick of perception, but the
art comes from connecting physical characteristics to character
... For a great caricaturist, physiognomy
is a reflection of the hidden soul: by showing us something
exaggerated, something overlooked is revealed.
... That is also
what gives caricature a polemical role in politics. Caricature
characterizes and criticizes. While it can also distort and
misrepresent, it claims to disclose a political physiognomy, bringing
its contours to the surface.
... Of course caricature is never truly accurate; its job is to
exaggerate, it dispenses with detail. This also makes it immune from
easy challenge. A caricature bypasses argument. And now that pictures
have become central to political life, caricatures have grown even
stronger, and caricatured images are joined by caricatures of ideas."
Political Symbols, History, &
Memory
Gordon
S. Wood/No Thanks for theMemories/New York Review of Books, January 13,
2011, Vol. LVIII, No. 1.
Review essay on Jill
Lepore/The Whites of Their Eyes: The Tea Party's Revolution and the
Battle Over American History (Princeton University Press 2010)
Gordon S. Wood notes the remarks of American historian Bernard Bailyn
on the difference between memory and history.
"Critical history-writing is all head and no heart. Scientific
history-writing, Bailyn writes, is always skeptical and problematic; it
questions itself constantly and keeps its distance from the past it is
trying to recover. By contrast, memory’s" relation to the past is an embrace.
It is not a critical, skeptical reconstruction of what happened. It is
the spontaneous, unquestioned experience of the past. It is absolute,
not tentative or distant, and it is expressed in signs and signals,
symbols, images, and mnemonic clues of all sorts. It shapes our
awareness whether we know it or not, and it is ultimately emotional,
not intellectual.
(Bernard Bailyn's remarks are in italics.)
James
M.
Lundberg, "Thanks a Lot, Ken Burns", Slate.com June 7, 2011
"Because of you, my [James Lundberg] Civil War lecture is always
packed—with
students raised on your sentimental, romantic, deeply misleading
portrait of the conflict."
"As ratings soared, George Will summed up the rhapsodic critical
response, calling Burns' series a 'masterpiece of national memory.'
... refashioned the history of the Civil War into a semimythical
narrative, one of collective sacrifice in the name of freedom and
national unity.
... Burns performs an impressive kind of alchemy. Working in the soft
glow of nostalgia, he manages to take a knotty and complex history of
violence, racial conflict, and disunion and turn it into a compelling
drama of national unity.
... For all its appeal, however, The Civil War is a deeply misleading
and reductive film that often loses historical reality in the mists of
Burns' sentimental vision and the romance of Foote's anecdotes.
Watching the film, you might easily forget that one side was not
fighting for, but against the very things that Burns claims the war so
gloriously achieved. Confederates, you might need reminding after
seeing it, were fighting not for the unification of the nation, but for
its dissolution. Moreover, they were fighting for their independence
from the United States in the name of slavery and the racial hierarchy
that underlay it."
For "The Civil
War" film by Ken Burns, see: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2175875963366512516#.
IX. The
Paranoid Style &
Conspiracy Thinking
1. The Paranoid
Style In American Politics: Richard Hofstadter
Readings: Richard
Hofstadter/The Paranoid Style In American
Politics, Introduction
&
pp.
3-92.
Richard
Hofstadter/The Paranoid Style In American Politics (An
essay which addresses a number of the themes in his
book)/Harper's/November
1964
For background on Hofstadter and his work, see: David
Greenberg/Richard Hofstadter: The pundits' favorite
historian/slate.com/June 7, 2006
On conspiracy thinking, see: Michael
Barkun, A
Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America
(University of California Press 2003)
See Chapter Five of Michael Barkun's book @ http://www.ucpress.edu/excerpt.php?isbn=9780520248120#readchapter5.
2. "The Manchurian Candidate"
Susan
L. Carruthers/"The Manchurian Candidate" (1962) & The
Cold War Brainwashing Scare/Historical Journal Of Film, Radio &
Television, March1998, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p75, 20p.
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
The classic film
on conspiracy thinking referred
to by both
the left and the right. "Brainwashed" Americans held as prisoners of
war
by the North Koreans and others during the Koran War of 1950-1953
return
to America where one of them has been programmed to commit
assassination. See this review of the film "The Manchurian Candidate" (1962).
This
article by Susan L. Carruthers is highly recommended.
Mark Sauter, "Manchurian Candidate Was No Mere
Fiction" @ http://www.realclearhistory.com/articles/2012/10/30/manchurian_candidate_was_no_mere_fiction.html
For a discussion of the related question of the
"Stockholm syndrome" and the role of changing societal perceptions of
indvidual responsibility and victimhood concerning captives of
terrorist groups,
see: Rick
Perlstein/That Girl: The Captivity and Restoration of Patty
Hearst/The Nation December 29, 2008, Vol. 287 Issue 22, p30-32, 3p.
(pdf)
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
Film: The
Manchurian Candidate (1962)
For
background information on this film, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manchurian_Candidate_%281962_film%29
3. "The Crucible" - A Favorite Of
Many
Secondary
School
Teachers, (& Of The Left)
Video:
The
Crucible (1996)
Arthur
Miller, "Why I Wrote The Crucible:
An Artist's Answer to Politics",
The NewYorker, October
21& 28, 1996.
Miller's essay can be accessed @ this site.
Midge
Dexter/The Witches of Arthur Miller/Commentary March 1997.
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
Interested
students may wish to look at these materials related to "The Crucible" and conspiracy thinking.
Arthur
Miller's The Crucible: (1952)
The Play & The Movie
Linnda
R. Caporael/Ergotism:
The Satan Loosed in Salem? (Convulsive ergotism may have been a
physiological
basis for the Salem witchcraft crisis in 1692)/Science Vol. 192/April
02.1976
SeeAlso:
Alan
Taylor/Crucibles (Review Of Mary Beth Norton, In The Devil's
Snare:The Salem Witchcraft Crisis Of 1692)/The New Republic/November
10, 2003, Vol. 229, Issue 19.
Texas State University Library permalink. A
valid Texas
State
University User Name and password are required for access.
See also:
Margo Burns, "Arthur Miller's 'The Crucible"' Fact & Fiction" (Oct.
24, 2003) @
http://www.17thc.us/docs/fact-fiction.shtml.
"The
American 1950s" - Links to materials for the period most
discussed
in relation to "The Crucible".
Recommended
Sharon
LaFraniere/African Crucible: Cast as Witches, Then Cast Out/NYT
November 15, 2007
Return
to Top
Return
to Topics
X. The
Psychology
Of Empire
1. Mannoni: Dependence &
Inferiority
2. American Empire: Real
Or Falsely Accused?
Readings:
O.
Mannoni/Prospero & Caliban:The Psychology Of Colonization
Pankaj
Mishra/How the British invented Hinduism/New Statesman August 26, 2002
"By reviving the Hindu
religion, the middle classes of India hope to
turn their country into a world power. Yet before the 19th century, no
such religion existed."
This article by Pankaj Mishra should be read in connection with
viewing the film "A Passage To India". It should be noted that
the main character in this film and in the novel on which it is based
is, in fact, Muslim.
Video: A
Passage To India (1985)
Based on the novel E.
M. Forster/A Passage To India (1924)
Recommended Book
For an interesting example of early 20th century
European
fiction which reflects images of the Orient see: Louis
Couperus,(Revised & Edited by E.M.Beekman-Translated From
Dutch)/The
Hidden Force (Univ. Of Mass. 1985) In Beekman's
introduction to this novel written in 1900 about the Dutch colonial
experience
in Indonesia, he quotes the Dutch author, Couperus, a romantic of his
time
who believed in supernatural forces: "I believe that benovolent and
hostile
forces float around us right through our ordinary, everyday
existence.
I believe that the Oriental, no matter where he comes from can command
more power over these forces than the Westerner who is absorbed by his
sobriety, business and making money."
**************************************************************************
Return to Top
Return to Topics
RESOURCES FOR
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY
International
Bulletin of Political Psychology
University
Programs
In
Political
Psychology
Center
For Study of Political Psychology/University of Minnesota
UC
Irvine/ Graduate Program in Political Psychology
Law &
Psychology
American
Psychology - Law Society
Law & Psychology
University Of Alabama
************************************************************************
Academic Honesty
Statement
Learning and teaching take place best in an atmosphere of
intellectual
freedom and openness. All members of the academic community are
responsible
for supporting freedom and openness through rigorous personal standards
of honesty and fairness. Plagiarism and other forms of academic
dishonesty
undermine the very purpose of the university and diminish the value of
an education.
Academic Offenses
Students who have committed academic dishonesty, which includes
cheating on an examination or other academic work to be submitted,
plagiarism,
collusion, or abuse of resource materials, are subject to disciplinary
action.
a. Academic work means the preparation of an essay, thesis, report,
problem assignments, or other projects which are to be submitted for
purposes
of grade determination.
b. Cheating means:
1. Copying from another student?s test paper, laboratory report,
other report or computer files, data listing, and/or programs.
2. Using materials during a test unauthorized by person giving test.
3. Collaborating, without authorization, with another person during
an examination or in preparing academic work.
4. Knowingly, and without authorization, using, buying, selling,
stealing, transporting, soliciting, copying, or possessing, in whole or
part, the content of an unaministered test.
5. Substituting for another student?or permitting another person
to substitute for oneself in taking an exam or preparing academic work.
6. Bribing another person to obtain an unadministered test or
information
about an unadministered test.
c. Plagiarism means the appropriation of another?s work and the
unacknowledged incorporation of that work in one?s own written work
offered
for credit. (Underline Added)
d. Collusion means the unauthorized collaboration with another
person
in preparing written work offered for credit.
e. Abuse of resource materials means the mutilation, destruction,
concealment, theft or alteration of materials provided to assist
students
in the mastery of course materials.
Penalties for Academic Dishonesty
Students who have committeed academic dishonesty may be subject
to:
a. Academic penalty including one or more of the following when
not inconsistent:
1. A requirement to perform additional academic work not required
of other students in the course;
2. Required to withdraw from the course with a grade of F.(Underline
Added)
3. A reduction to any level grade in the course, or on the exam
or other academic work affected by the academic dishonesty.
b. Disciplinary penalty including any penalty which may be imposed
in a student disciplinary hearing pursuant to this Code of Conduct.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------