POLITICAL SCIENCE 4345                                                                                            DR. LEDER
AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY
 

Department Of Political Science/Texas State University
The online version of this syllabus can be accessed @ http://arnoldleder.com/4345.htm.
A condensed version of this syllabus for print as well as password protected materials for this course can be viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.htmlScroll to the section on "American Foreign Policy".  For the condensed print syllabus in the section on "American Foreign Policy" click on the link labeled "Condensed 4345 Print Syllabus".  Password and user name for access will be provided to students in the course.  For links to web syllabi for other courses taught by Dr. Leder see: http://www.arnoldleder.com/For a list of undergraduate courses in Political Science by group, see: http://www.polisci.txstate.edu/courses/undergrad-courses.html.

Office: ELA 335
Office Hours: TBA & by appointment
Texas State University Academic Schedule
Texas State University Final Exam Schedule
Schedule of Classes @ Texas State University

Selected Web Resources For Texas State University
Texas State University Library
Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library
Citation & Bibliographic Styles & Related Information

Selected Web Resources For Political Science
Portals to the World Home Page (Library of Congress)
Internet Political Science Resources-Extensive University Links/University Of Michigan
TheWWW Virtual Library:International Affairs Resources
The Ultimate Political Science Links Page

Internet Islamic History Sources/Fordham University (Comprehensive Site With Links For Many Aspects Of The Islamic Experience)

Links To Sites On Terrorism (Library of Congress)

Note:
Wikipedia is used in several instances in this syllabus as a source of information or reference on a variety of matters.  Students should be aware of the dispute among academics and others with respect to the reliability and accuracy of Wikipedia and they should not assume that a Wikipedia entry, at any given time, is the last word or most accurate information on the subject.  For an interesting essay on Wikipedia, see:  Stacy Schiff/Know It All: Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?/The New Yorker/July 31, 2006 (Note: See Naom Cohen's NYT March 05, 2007 article, also noted below, for a problem with Schiff's article.)
Schiff's article may be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library  A valid Texas State University student ID and user name are required.

For another view of the merits of Wikipedia, see:
Brock Read/Can Wikipedia Ever Make the Grade?/The Chronicle Of Higher Education/October 27, 2006
"As questions about the accuracy of the anyone-can-edit encyclopedia persist, academics are split on whether to ignore it, or start contributing."
See also:
Noam Cohen/A History Department (Middlebury College in Vermont) Bans Citing Wikipedia as a Research Source/NYT February 21, 2007
Naom Cohen/A Contributor to Wikipedia Has His Fictional Side/NYT March 05, 2007
With Wikipedia, what you see is not always what you get (with related links)/blog.foreignpolicy.com/node/3872/March 06, 2007 (Note the reference in this piece to the
Stacy Schiff article above in which Schiff interviewed a Wikipedia site administrator and contributor called Essjay whose academic credentials were, in fact, fabricated.)

For information on self-interested editing of Wikipedia, see: Katie Hafner/Seeing Corporate Fingerprints in Wikipedia Edits/NYT August 19, 2007.
"... examples of insider editing came to light last week through WikiScanner, a new Web site that traces the source of millions of changes to Wikipedia, the popular online encyclopedia that anyone can edit.
The site, http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/, created by a computer science graduate student, cross-references an edited entry on Wikipedia with the owner of the computer network where the change originated, using the Internet protocol address of the editor’s network. The address information was already available on Wikipedia, but the new site makes it much easier to connect those numbers with the names of network owners.
Since Wired News first wrote about WikiScanner last week, Internet users have spotted plenty of interesting changes to Wikipedia by people at nonprofit groups and government entities like the Central Intelligence Agency. Many of the most obviously self-interested edits have come from corporate networks."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note On Course & Syllabus Materials: Students may find books, articles, links, websites, and other materials provided in this syllabus useful and of interest. Their listing in this syllabus, including those which are required and recommended, does not necessarily indicate endorsement of or agreement with any views or positions on any issues found in these materials, websites, or on other sites to which they may provide links.

Note On Access To Articles:  Access to articles through the Texas State University Library, @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library available to all Texas State University students, requires a valid User Name and a Password.  Most of the links in this syllabus provide direct access to the article.

Password Protected Materials: Some materials on this web syllabus are password protected and are directly accessible @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.html. These materials are for student use. The password will be provided to students in the course.
 

COURSE ORGANIZATION & STUDENT RESPONSIBILITIES

Class Participation, Oral Presentations, Exams, Papers, Grades
1. This course includes two formats.  One is lecture when appropriate and the other is a seminar  format when course materials make this more suitable.  Students must attend every class meeting and be prepared to discuss assigned readings and other materials.  Active participation in class discussion is essential.  Course grades will be determined by oral presentations, class participation, and written papers.
2. Determinants of Course Grade: Oral Reports & Presentations 25%/ Seminar Participation 15%/ Essay Exams/Papers 60%

Attendance
1. Three (3) unexcused absences are permitted.  Students with four (4) unexcused absences will have their course grade lowered by one letter grade.  Students who have five (5) unexcused absences will have their course grade lowered by two letter grades.  No absences beyond five (5) for any reason are permitted.  Any student who has more than five absences is likely to fail the course and, therefore, should withdraw from the course.
2. The instructor for the course is not responsible for bringing students who have missed class "up-to-date" on missed material.  Each student has the responsibility to remain current with respect to class material.

************************************************************************************************
STUDENT RESPONSIBILITIES
Please see: Academic Honesty Statement for Texas State University @
http://www.txstate.edu/effective/upps/upps-07-10-01.html.
An excerpt from this statement can be found at the end of this syllabus.

OVERVIEW OF COURSE

Course Title
AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY

Topics
I. An Overview & Approaches To The Study Of Foreign Policy
1.The National Interest
2. The Cold War
3. Nuclear War

II. The International Setting
1.Clash Of Civilizations?/The Huntington Thesis
2. American Power

III. Political Culture & The Ideological Setting Of American Foreign Policy Formulation
1. American Political Culture
a. Political Culture & Foreign Policy Behavior
b. The American Creed: Louis Hartz, S. Huntington, S. Hoffman, & Others
c. "Cowboy Ethics"
2. Democracy & "Illiberal Democracy"
a. The Case For Democracy
b. Promoting Democracy: Favorable Views
c. Promoting Democracy: Doubts & Criticism
d. Free Markets & Democracy

IV. Interest Groups, Symbols, Communication, & Congress

V. The State Department

VI. The Military

VII. Intelligence

VIII. The Presidency

IX. American Empire?

X. Putting It All Together: Reflections & Discussion

REQUIRED READINGS
Books
-John Lewis Gaddis/Surprise, Security, & The American Experience (Harvard Univ. Press 2004)

-RobertKagan/Of Paradise And Power:America And Europe In The New World Order (Vintage2004 
-Natan Sharansky/The Case For Democracy: The Power Of Freedom To Overcome Tyranny & Terror (PublicAffairs-PerseusBooks 2004)

-FareedZakaria/TheFuture Of Freedom:Illiberal Democracy At Home And Abroad (Norton2004)

Recommended Books:
Niall Ferguson/Colossus: The Price Of America's Empire (Peguin 2004)
Anatol Lieven/America Right Or Wrong: An Anatomy Of American Nationalism (Oxford Univ. Press 2004)

Articles for reading and class discussion are listed in the appropriate sections of this syllabus.

Videos
Dr. Strangelove/(1964)[1 hour 33 minutes]DVD/amazon.com
High Noon(1952)[1hour 35 minutes]/DVD/.amazon.com
Shane/(1953)[1 hour 57 minutes]/DVD/amazon.com

TOPICS FOR LECTURE, CLASS DISCUSSION, AND ASSIGNED READINGS
I.  An Overview & Approaches to the Study of Foreign Policy

1. The National Interest
The National Security Strategy of the United States of America/http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc.html

2. The Cold War
George F. Kennan ("X")/The Sources Of Soviet Conduct/Foreign Affairs July 1947
This article can also be accessed @Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library. A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required. 
For background information on George Kennan and access to many of his publications, see: http://www.foreignaffairs.org/background/kennan
Also see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_F._Kennan
Kremlinology - See: Clifford J. Levy/Required Reading in Moscow: Tea Leaves/NYT Week in Review/Sunday, September 16, 2007
"While Russia in the Putin era is a far more open society than the Soviet state, the inner workings of the Kremlin are as confounding as ever."

James Traub/Who Put the 'Cold' in Cold War?/NYT Sunday Book Review April 29, 2007 A review of John Lukacs/George Kennan: A Study of Character (Yale University Press April 2007).  Read the first chapter of Lukacs' book on George Kennan.

John Lewis Gaddis, "After Containment: The Legacy Of George Kennan In The Age Of Terrorism", The New Republic, April 25, 2005, Vol. 232, Issue 15.
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

TheReportFromIronMountain/LeonardLewin/Nov.1967(WithRemarksByLeonardLewin/NYTBookReview/March19.1972)
ReportFromIronMountain/Background&DescriptionOfReport/museumofhoaxes.com/iron.html

Jeane J. Kirkpatrick/Dictatorships & Double Standards/Commentary/November 1979
The classic 1979 article which served as a reference point for many in the latter days of the Cold War and beyond.

"Although most governments in the world are, as they always have been, autocracies of one kind or another, no idea holds greater sway in the mind of educated Americans than the belief that it is possible to democratize governments, anytime, anywhere, under any circumstances. This notion is belied by an enormous body of evidence based on the experience of dozens of countries which have attempted with more or less (usually less) success to move from autocratic to democratic government. Many of the wisest political scientists of this and previous centuries agree that democratic institutions are especially difficult to establish and maintain-because they make heavy demands on all portions of a population and because they depend on complex social, cultural, and economic conditions.
...
Since many traditional autocracies permit limited contestation and participation, it is not impossible that U.S. policy could effectively encourage this process of liberalization and democratization, provided that the effort is not made at a time when the incumbent government is fighting for its life against violent adversaries, and that proposed reforms are aimed at producing gradual change rather than perfect democracy overnight. To accomplish this, policymakers are needed who understand how actual democracies have actually come into being. History is a better guide than good intentions."

Timothy Noah/Realist:The former U.N. ambassador's neoconservatism looks quaint today/Slate December 08, 2006
Observations on the applicability of the views in Jeane J. Krikpatrick's much discussed 1979 article to contemporary foreign policy matters.
"Like a lot of neoconservative thought, 'Dictatorships and Double Standards' made a categorical pronouncement about the laws governing human affairs that was later proved wrong.
...
On the other hand, Kirkpatrick's skepticism about the United States' ability to bring democracy anywhere and everywhere in the world looks prescient today. It has also been widely ignored by Kirkpatrick's fellow neocons."

3. Nuclear War
Video
Dr. Strangelove
TimDirks,InDepthReviewOfDr.Strangelove/filmsite.org/drst.html 
Christopher Coker/Dr. Strangelove and the real Doomsday machine/timesonline.co.uk/August 08, 2007 (A review of Doomsday Men: The real Dr. Strangelove and the dream of the superweapon by P. D. Smith - 2007) 

Film Clips from "Dr. Strangelove":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxrWz9XVvls (01:57)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeedOjAbo4o (04:38)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29czSGSPE7k&mode=related&search= (0:11)

The famous Cold War film "Duck And Cover":
http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itps/0305/ijpe/duckncvr.htm
"In 1951, the newly established Federal Civil Defense Administration (FCDA) commissioned production of a film to instruct children how to react in the event of a nuclear attack. The result was Duck and Cover, a film lasting nine minutes that was shown in schools throughout the United States during the 1950s and beyond. It featured a cartoon character, Bert the Turtle, who "was very alert" and "knew just what to do: duck and cover." At the sound of an alarm or the flash of a brilliant light signaling a nuclear explosion, Bert would instantly tuck his body under his shell. Below, in a photo from November 21,1951, sixth-grade students and their teacher at Public School 152 in the Queens borough of New York City, act out a scene depicted in the film by crouching under or beside their desks."

BillKeller/TheThinkable/NYTSundayMagazine/May04.2003
"During the last years of the cold war, weapons of mass destruction were mostly abstractions to be counted and negotiated.  Suddenly, with too few people paying attention, they are proliferating, and those who now have or want nukes will use them to blackmail, or worse."

II.  The International Setting

1. Clash Of Civilizations?/The Huntington Thesis
Samuel P. Huntington, "The Clash of Civilizations?", Foreign Affairs Summer 1993, Vol. 72, Issue 3.  For a 500 word preview of this article and the abstract, see:
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19930601faessay5188/samuel-p-huntington/the-clash-of-civilizations.html
The full text of this article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library.  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
The full text of this article can also be viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.htmlScroll to section on "American Foreign Policy" and look for the author and title of this article.  This location is password protected.  Password and user name for access will be provided to students in the course.  Additional information on the Huntington thesis can be found @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clash_of_Civilizations. (See note on wikipedia at beginning of syllabus.)
For additional links (some links may be "down") to essays and articles concerning the Huntington thesis see:
The Clash Of Civilizations?/Links/brothersjudd.com
Samuel P. Huntington/The Clash of Civilizations Revisited - Interview with Samuel P. Huntington/New Perspectives Quarterly (NPQ), Winter, 2007
Fouad Ajami/The Clash-an essay/NYT Sunday Book Review January 6, 2008
"I doubted Samuel Huntington when he predicted a struggle between Islam and the West. My mistake."

Josef Joffe/Clashing Civilizations Revisited/Middle East Strategy at Harvard/January 10, 2008
"Civilizational conflicts will supersede ideological conflicts. This is the key idea in Samuel Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations. I did not share this idea then, and I do not believe in it today.
...  As modernization expands, so has resistance to this quintessentially Western gift, and not just in the Muslim world. Multiculturalism with its anti-Western bias ('Eurocentrism,' 'Orientalism') has found a comfortable place in the Western academy and media. Today, we are less confident that secularization is the way the world goes. Nonetheless, what is almost an aside in Huntington’s Clash, raises the most fascinating questions for the future. What is the relationship between religion, culture and modernity?"

Jerry Z. Muller/Us and Them: The Enduring Power of Ethnic Nationalism/Foreign Affairs March-April 2008
See also: Is Ethnic Conflict Inevitable?: Parting Ways Over Nationalism and Separatism/Foreign Affairs July-August 2008 - Responses to Jerry Z. Muller/Us and Them: The Enduring Power of Ethnic Nationalism and Muller's reply.
2.American Power
Robert Kagan, Of Paradise And Power: America and Europe in the New World Order the entire book.
For the original article which Kagan later developed into a book, see: Robert Kagan/Power & Weakness/Policy Review/June-July 2002
Ronald D. Asmus & Kenneth M. Pollack/The New Transatlantic Project: A Response to Robert Kagan/Policy Review/October-November 2002
Robert Kagan/End of Dreams, Return of History/Policy Review/August & September 2007
"The world has become normal again. The years immediately following the end of the Cold War offered a tantalizing glimpse at a new kind of international order, with nations growing together or disappearing altogether, ideological conflicts melting away, cultures intermingling through increasingly free commerce and communications. But that was a mirage, the hopeful anticipation of a liberal, democratic world that wanted to believe the end of the Cold War did not end just one strategic and ideological conflict but all strategic and ideological conflict. People and their leaders longed for 'a world transformed.' Today the nations of the West still cling to that vision. Evidence to the contrary — the turn toward autocracy in Russia or the growing military ambitions of China — is either dismissed as a temporary aberration or denied entirely.

The world has not been transformed, however. Nations remain as strong as ever, and so too the nationalist ambitions, the passions, and the competition among nations that have shaped history. The world is still “unipolar,” with the United States remaining the only superpower. But international competition among great powers has returned, with the United States, Russia, China, Europe, Japan, India, Iran, and others vying for regional predominance. Struggles for honor and status and influence in the world have once again become key features of the international scene. Ideologically, it is a time not of convergence but of divergence. The competition between liberalism and absolutism has reemerged, with the nations of the world increasingly lining up, as in the past, along ideological lines. Finally, there is the fault line between modernity and tradition, the violent struggle of Islamic fundamentalists against the modern powers and the secular cultures that, in their view, have penetrated and polluted their Islamic world."

See also: Robert Kagan/The End Of The End Of History/The New Republic April 23, 2008, Vol. 238, No. 4, 834, pp. 40-47
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Fareed Zakaria/The Future of American Power: How America Can Survive the Rise of the Rest/Foreign Affairs May-June 2008
Despite some eerie parallels between the position of the United States today and that of the British Empire a century ago, there are key differences. Britain's decline was driven by bad economics. The United States, in contrast, has the strength and dynamism to continue shaping the world -- but only if it can overcome its political dysfunction and reorient U.S. policy for a world defined by the rise of other powers.

Charles Krauthammer, "The Unipolar Moment Revisited", TheNational Interest, Winter 2002-2003.
"The future of the unipolar era hinges on whether America is governed by those who wish to retain, augment, and use unipolarity to advance not just American but global ends, or whether America is governed by those who wish to give it up either by allowing unipolarity to decay as they retreat to Fortress America, or by passing on the burden by gradually transferring power to multilateral institutions as heirs to American hegemony."
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required. The online article is in PDF.
Parag Khanna/Waving Goodbye to Hegemony/NYT Sunday Magazine January 26, 2008
"... the distribution of power in the world has fundamentally altered over the two presidential terms of George W. Bush, both because of his policies and, more significant, despite them. ...
At best, America’s unipolar moment lasted through the 1990s, but that was also a decade adrift. The post-cold-war “peace dividend” was never converted into a global liberal order under American leadership. So now, rather than bestriding the globe, we are competing — and losing — in a geopolitical marketplace alongside the world’s other superpowers: the European Union and China. This is geopolitics in the 21st century: the new Big Three. Not Russia, an increasingly depopulated expanse run by Gazprom.gov; not an incoherent Islam embroiled in internal wars; and not India, lagging decades behind China in both development and strategic appetite. The Big Three make the rules — their own rules — without any one of them dominating. And the others are left to choose their suitors in this post-American world."

Fareed Zakaria/Our Way:The Trouble With Being The World's Only Superpower/The New Yorker/October 14, 2002
Zakaria's essay Includes remarks on Robert Kagan/Power & Weakness/Policy Review/June-July 2002

Azar Gat/The Return of Authoritarian Great Powers/Foreign Affairs July-August, 2007, Vol. 86, No. 4. (This link is for the preview.)  The complete text of Azar Gat's article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library. A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.  The complete text of the Gat article is directly accessible @ http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/06/the_return_of_authoritarian_gr.html.
"Liberal democracy, led by the United States, may have emerged triumphant from the great struggles of the twentieth century. But the post-Cold War rise of economically successful -- and nondemocratic -- China and Russia may represent a viable alternative path to modernity that leaves liberal democracy's ultimate victory and future dominance in doubt."
See also: Robert Kagan/History's Back: Ambitious autocracies, hesitant democracies/The Weekly Standard August 25, 2008, Vol. 013, Issue 46
Compare Kagan's view to the much discussed (and in recent years frequently challenged) 1989 essay by Francis Fukuyama in which Fukuyama contended:
"
What we may be witnessing is not just the end of the Cold War, or the passing of a particular period of postwar history, but the end of history as such: that is, the end point of mankind's ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government. This is not to say that there will no longer be events to fill the pages of Foreign Affair's yearly summaries of international relations, for the victory of liberalism has occurred primarily in the realm of ideas or consciousness and is as yet incomplete in. the real or material world. But there are powerful reasons for believing that it is the ideal that will govern the material world in the long run. To understand how this is so, we must first consider some theoretical issues concerning the nature of historical change."
See: Francis Fukuyama/The End of History?/The National Interest Summer 1989

Daniel W. Drezner/The Grandest Strategy Of Them All/Washington Post Sunday December 17, 2006, p. B1.
"Mere dissatisfaction with today's foreign policy doesn't guarantee that a new vision will take its place. As Jeffrey Legro, a political scientist at the University of Virginia, recently pointed out in his book "Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order," a lot is required for a real shift in worldviews. A new strategy must be more than visionary; it must provide attractive and practical solutions to current challenges. During the Cold War, containment's appeal was that it offered a coherent vision for how to deal with the Soviet Union, as well as concrete policy steps that flowed from that vision."
William Safire/On Language-Realism: The Comeback word in foreign policy/NYT Sunday Magazine, December 24, 2006
"Realism,
as word and policy, had its ups and down through the Clinton years, but in the first term of Bush II was battered by what the historian Robert Kagan calls “Americans’ belief in the possibility of global transformation — the ‘messianic’ impulse.” As public impatience grew with “the long, hard slog” in Iraq, however, the stock of Wilsonian idealism fell out of bed, and realism came back into oratorical vogue and, in last month’s elections, into shared political power.
Ascendant realists now face the problem introduced in The New Yorker: even amid war-weariness, how to justify a label with a history of unprincipled dickering with dictators and an amoral priority of stability over the export of freedom?"

Niall Ferguson/The Next War of the Worlds/Foreign Affairs September-October 2006, Vol. 85, No. 5.  Note: This link provides access to a preview of this article.  The complete text of this article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library.  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Jack Snyder/The Crusade of Illusions/Foreign Affairs July-August 2006, Vol. 85, No. 4.
- Review Essay on Christopher Layne/The Peace of Illusions: America's Grand Strategy From 1940 to the Present (Cornell University Press 2006) and Colin Dueck/Reluctant Crusades: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy (Princeton University Press 2006).

Paul Starobin/Beyond Hegemony/National Journal December 01, 2006
"It is one of the great unmentionables in American politics: the idea that superpower America could ever be something less than No. 1 in the world. Or is it?"

John Rapley/The New Middle Ages/Foreign Affairs May-June 2006, Vol. 85, No. 3
"The Middle Ages ended when the rise of capitalism on a national scale led to powerful states with sovereignty over particular territories and populations. Now that capitalism is operating globally, those states are eroding and a new medievalism is emerging, marked by multiple and overlapping sovereignties and identities -- particularly in the developing world, where states were never strong in the first place."
Note: This link provides access to a preview of this article.  The complete text of this article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library.  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Mark Lilla/The End Of Politics: Europe, The Nation-State, And The Jews/The New Republic June 23, 2003
Mark Lilla's article can also be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Paul Berman, "The Anti-Anti-Americans: France's Failures, Hatreds, and Signs of a New Look at America", The New Republic, November 28, 2005, Vol. 233, Issue 22/23.
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Recommended:
Lee Harris/The Intellectual Origins Of America-Bashing/Policy Review December 2002
Peter J. Katzenstein, Robert O. Keohane/Anti-Americanisms/Policy Review October-November 2006
"... there is a widespread feeling that anti-Americanism is more than simply opposition to what the United States does, but extends to opposition to what the United States is — what it stands for. Critiques of the United States often extend far beyond its foreign policy: to its social and economic practices, including the public role of women; to its social policies, including the death penalty; and to its popular culture, including the flaunting of sex. Globalization is often seen as Americanization and resented as such."

Andrei S. Markovits, "Western Europe's America Problem", The Chronicle Review-Chronicle of Higher Education, January 19, 2007.
The complete text of this article is accessible @ this location. Scroll to the text of the article.

Liberals & Liberal Hawks On American Power
Peter Beinart/A Fighting Faith/The New Republic/December 02 2004
Kevin Drum/Liberals & Terrorism(A response to Beinart's A Fighting Faith)/Washington Monthly/December 02 2004
Peter Beinart/The Good Fight (A rejoinder to Kevin Drum)/The New Republic/December 20 2004
These articles can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

David Corn/Liberals On Terror (Corn's response to Beinart's A Fighting Faith)/tompaine.com/December 09 2004

A Conservative View On Liberals & Liberal Hawks
William Voegeli/The Implausibility Of A New Liberalism/claremont.org/December 08 2004

Realism & "Democratic Realism"
Francis Fukuyama, "The Neoconservative Moment", The National Interest, Summer, 2004
Charles Krauthammer, "In Defense of Democratic Realism, The National Interest, Fall, 2004
The above two articles can be accessed @  Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Return to beginning of syllabus.
Return to Overview of Course & Topics
 

III. Political Culture & The Ideological Setting of American Foreign Policy Formulation

1. American Political Culture
Henry R. Nau/Why We Fight Over Foreign Policy/Policy Review April-May 2007

a. Political Culture & Foreign Policy Behavior
An Example From China
Jacqueline A. Newmyer/China's Air-Power Puzzle: The Cultural Roots of Beijing's Preference For Missiles Over Planes/Policy Review June & July 2003
An Example From America:
Paul T. McCartney/American Nationalism and US Foreign Policy from September 11 to the Iraq War/Political Science Quarterly, Fall 2004, Vol. 119, Issue 3. (pdf)

This article can also be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

b. The American Creed: Louis Hartz, S. Huntington, S. Hoffman, & Others
Samuel P. Huntington, "American Ideals versus American Institutions", Political Science Quarterly, Spring, 1982, Vol. 97, No. 1, pp. 1-37.
This Huntington article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library. A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

George McKenna/The Puritan Origins of American Patriotism/Yale University Press (2007)
Click on Excerpts for the text of the first eight pages of the Introduction, "The Puritan Legacy". (pdf)
From Yale University Press:
"In this absorbing book, George McKenna ranges across the entire panorama of American history to track the development of American patriotism. That patriotism — shaped by Reformation Protestantism and imbued with the American Puritan belief in a providential “errand” — has evolved over 350 years and influenced American political culture in both positive and negative ways, McKenna shows. The germ of the patriotism, an activist theology that stressed collective rather than individual salvation, began in the late 1630s in New England and traveled across the continent, eventually becoming a national phenomenon. Today, American patriotism still reflects its origins in the seventeenth century.

By encouraging cohesion in a nation of diverse peoples and inspiring social reform, American patriotism has sometimes been a force for good. But the book also uncovers a darker side of the nation’s patriotism — a prejudice against the South in the nineteenth century, for example, and a tendency toward nativism and anti-Catholicism. Ironically, a great reversal has occurred, and today the most fervent believers in the Puritan narrative are the former “outsiders” — Catholics and Southerners. McKenna offers an interesting new perspective on patriotism’s role throughout American history, and he concludes with trenchant thoughts on its role in the post-9/11 era."


John Gray/Chosen ones/Financial Times November 10, 2007- Review of George McKenna/The Puritan Origins of American Patriotism/Yale University Press (2007).
(Note: The Financial Times may require registration.  There is no fee.)
America's unshakeable faith in its ability to remould the world is an inheritance from puritanism.

The intense religiosity of American life has bemused Europeans at least since Alexis de Tocqueville commented on it in the early 19th century. It is not just that America is more religious than practically any other advanced country. More, religion seems to inform American national identity in ways that have few parallels in other countries. Being British does not entail subscribing to any creed - it is simply an accident of birth - and the same is true in other European nations. By contrast, being American seems to inv-olve accepting that the US has been assigned a special role in history - an idea echoing religious belief in providence.


Interview with George Mckenna on Puritan patriotism @Between the Covers on National Review Online (listening time 10 min.) September 25, 2007.
George McKenna, author of
The Puritan Origins of American Patriotism, tells John J. Miller that Puritan patriotism is “a social ideology.

Robert Kagan/Neocon Nation: Neoconservatism, c. 1776/World Affairs Spring-2008

Stanley Hoffman, "More Perfect Union: Nation & Nationalism In America", Harvard International Review, Winter 1997, Vol. 20, Issue 1.
The Hoffman article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
Jack Critin, Ernst B. Haas, Christopher Muste, "Is American Nationalism Changing? Implications for Foreign Policy", International Studies Quarterly (1994) 38, 1-31.
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Samuel P. Huntington/The Hispanic Challenge/Foreign Policy March-April 2004 (pdf)
"The persistent inflow of Hispanic immigrants threatens to divide the United States into two peoples, two cultures, and two languages. Unlike past immigrant groups, Mexicans and other Latinos have not assimilated into mainstream U.S. culture, forming instead their own political and linguistic enclaves—from Los Angeles to Miami—and rejecting the Anglo-Protestant values that built the American dream. The United States ignores this challenge at its peril."

Jack Citrin, Amy Lerman, Michael Murakami, and Kathryn Pearson/Testing Huntington: Is Hispanic Immigration a Threat to American Identity?/Perspectives on Politics March, 2007, Volume 05, Issue 01  (pdf)
"...  The second paper, by Citrin, Lerman, Murakami, and Pearson takes issue with the influential arguments Samuel Huntington advances regarding the threats posed to American national identity by Latino immigration to the United States. Huntington advanced his views in non-academic venues in the context of growing public debate about immigration policy. Citrin et al. argue that the empirical data simply do not support Huntington's views."

The html version of the article, "Testing Huntington", with internal links and links to references, can be viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.htmlScroll to section on "American Foreign Policy" and look for the title "Testing Huntington".  In the document, scroll to the abstract and then to the full text of the article.  This location is password protected.  Password and user name for access will be provided to students in the course.

David Gelernter, "Americanism-and Its Enemies", Commentary, January 2005.
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
Colin Kidd, "My God was bigger than his", London Review Of Books, 4 November 2004, Vol. 26, No. 21.
A review essay of several recently published books on American political culture and nationalism with lengthy comments on Anatol Lieven/America Right Or Wrong: An Anatomy Of American Nationalism.
This article can be viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.html. Scroll to section on "American Foreign Policy" and look for the author and title of this article.  This location is password protected.  Password and user name for access will be provided to students in the course.

Paul Starobin, "State Of The Union: Misfit America", The Atlantic Monthly, January-February, 2006.
"Many of the values and cultural attributes that once made the United States unique have eroded; those that remain look increasingly ugly to some foreigners. Is our evolving national character a liability in our foreign relations?"
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Recommended Additional Articles On American Political Culture & The American Creed:
Anatol Lieven, "Taking Back America", London Review of Books, 2 December 2004, Vol. 26, No. 3.
This article can be viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.html. Scroll to section on "American Foreign Policy" and look for the author and title of this article.  This location is password protected.  Password and user name for access will be provided to students in the course.
Jonathan Tepperman/The Anti-Anti-Americans/NYT/December 12, 2004
John Gerring, "Perspectives in Policy History -The Perils of Particularism: Political History After Hartz", Journal of Policy History 11.3 (1999) 313-322.
The Gerring article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
Peter Dreier & Dick Flacks/Patriotism's Secret History/The Nation/June 3 2002
Robert Bonner/Star-Spangled Sentiment/tcommon-place.org/vol-03/no-02/January 2003
"It is worth considering why Americans have invested their flags with such importance and how the United States has become more saturated with patriotic color than any other country in the world. The comparative intensity of American loyalties is less noteworthy than the country's fixation on a single symbol, which has come to be associated with a remarkably wide range of emotions."

c. "Cowboy Ethics"
Holiday Dmitri/Frontier Justice: Cowboy Ethics & The Bush Doctrine of Preemption/Research Project-University of Chicago 2003 (pdf) Abstract in html
An analysis of the use of an American popular culture icon, the cowboy, and "cowboy ethics" to legitimize the preemptive use of military force in foreign policy.
For information on the author, see her website @ holidaydmitri.com
This article can also be viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.html
Scroll to section on "American Foreign Policy" and look for the author and title of this article.  This location is password protected.  Password and user name for access will be provided to students in the course.

Karen Dodwell/From the Center: The Cowboy Myth, George W. Bush, and the War with Iraq/Americana @ americanpopularculture.com/March 2004
"As editorial writers began to recognize the ubiquity of the cowboy myth in commentary on the war with Iraq, some began to analyze Bush's cowboy image and tried to sort out the references to the good and the bad cowboy. Two editorials, for instance, analyzed how Bush fit or should fit Gary Cooper's image of the cowboy in the movie High Noon . An article in The All-American Post published by the Vietnam Veterans and Airborne Press asserts that George W. Bush should “examine his cowboy image” and try to be more like Gary Cooper than Clint Eastwood in Unforgiven who issues cruel threats as he leaves town. The article claimed Bush resembled the Gary Cooper style cowboy after 9-11 in his deliberate approach and gained much political capital; however, in his dealings with Iraq, Bush emulated Eastwood in Unforgiven . Brant Ayers, publisher of the Anniston Star , claimed the Bush administration had “blurred the quiet cowboy as a self-defining allegory” by being more like “a bad-humored, 20-foot American cowboy [who] tells the whole saloon he's going to drill the 3-foot bad guy, who doesn't stand a chance.” Ayers analyzed the Gary Cooper style cowboy and explained that Americans have looked up to the image of the quiet cowboy, personified by Gary Cooper as Sheriff Kane in High Noon , who only lost his quiet demeanor and fought when he was provoked by an outlaw." (boldface added)

Diana Pasulka/The Cowboy and the Christian: Quakers and Christian Pacifism in the Early Western/Thinking About Religion/2006, Vol. 6.
"High Noon is the first Western to blatantly critique Christian pacifism, represented by the denomination of Quakerism.  In preceding films and fiction, Christianity and Quakerism are held up as the religious ideal.  High Noon critiques this ideal in several ways.  The most explicit is Amy’s conversion in the end, as she takes up the gun to save her fiance.  Interestingly, Amy and her Quakerism, while shown to be erroneous, is still portrayed in a more favorable light than the other Christians in the town, who cower in church when Kane asks them for help.  Against Kane’s and Amy’s courage, these Christians look pathetic.  As with all Westerns, the killing is made to seem inevitable, if unfortunate, with the character of the Christian (most often a Quaker) functioning like a symbolic place-holder, reminding the audience that in the end the Christian way of non-violence is preferable.  In High Noon, however, a change occurs.  The Christians are made to look morally reprehensible, and the true morally right actions in the story are committed by those who kill.  In subsequent films the Christian is defeated again and again, made to look more ridiculous and cowardly, so that the choice of killing in self-defense or for revenge will appear more than unavoidable, it will appear moral." (boldface added)

J.Hoberman/It's Always 'High Noon' at the White House/NYT/April25.2004
Gary Cooper as the lone man of courage, dispensing violent justice despite the cowardice of the townspeople, in "High Noon," the film most often requested for screening by American presidents.
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
Kyle Smith/The Real Political Message of High Noon/pajamasmedia.com/June 10, 2008

Robert Kagan/Cowboy Nation/The New Republic/October 14, 2006-updated January 13, 2007
"These days, we are having a national debate over the direction of foreign policy. Beyond the obvious difficulties in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is a broader sense that our nation has gone astray. We have become too militaristic, too idealistic, too arrogant; we have become an "empire." Much of the world views us as dangerous. In response, many call for the United States to return to its foreign policy traditions, as if that would provide the answer.   ...   What exactly are those traditions?"

Recommended:
Chris Orr, "Home Movies: Into The Sunset", The New Republic, May 25, 2004
A review of the film "Once Upon a Time in the West" (1989), a film "about not only the end of the West but the end of the Western."
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Thomas S. Engeman/In Defense of Cowboy Culture/Claremont Review of Books/Summer 2003

Lucy Ash/Wild, wild east/newstatesman.com/29 November 2007
"Soviet-era cowboy films have inspired politicians, writers and cosmonauts alike."  Listen to a reading of this article at this location.

Max Boot, "In Search of Monsters?", Commentary, May 2004.
A review essay on John Lewis Gaddis' book Surprise, Security, & The American Experience (Harvard Univ. Press 2004)
This review can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

"... Gaddis’s major contribution is to treat the Bush Doctrine as a set of ideas worthy of scholarly examination rather than as a subject for ritualistic denunciation. He does not denigrate the President as a cowboy ..."  

Videos
High Noon/DVD/.amazon.com
HighNoonfilmsite.org/high.html
http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/47/highnoon.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_noon  (See note on wikipedia at beginning of syllabus.)
Film Clip from the film "High Noon" with sound track for the theme song (07:07)
Shane
Film Clips from the film "Shane":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFquzxwYoeE (09:18)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvVbXkgVUVw (02:50)

2. Democracy & "Illiberal Democracy"
Fareed Zakaria, The Future Of Freedom, chapters 1, 2, 3, 4.
Robert Kagan, "The Ungreat Washed: Why Democracy Must Remain America's Goal" (a review essay on Fareed Zakaria's The Future Of Freedom), The New Republic, July 3, 2003 For direct access to this article, see: http://www.powells.com/review/2003_07_03.html.
This article can also be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
Also see:  Fareed Zakaria/The Rise Of Illiberal Democracy/Foreign Affairs/November 1997.
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
Links For Reviews Of Zakaria's The Future Of Freedom & Links For Other Zakaria Writings/brothers.judd.com-Scroll to Links (Some links may be "down".)

a. The Case For Democracy
Books:
Natan Sharansky, The Case For Democracy, the entire book.
Gary Rosen, "Freedom From Fear", Newsweek, December 20 2004.
 "One of the more curious leaks from the White House right after the election was word that U.S. President George W. Bush had been reading a book. Notable in itself—the president isn't exactly a bookworm—the story was made still more interesting by the fact that the work in question was "The Case for Democracy" (PublicAffairs. 303 pages) by Natan Sharansky, who had even been summoned to the Oval Office for a chat. Supporters of Bush's policies in the Middle East took heart from this bit of news, while critics found yet another reason to grind their teeth. Sharansky's message, as he declares in his subtitle: The Power of Freedom to Overcome Tyranny & Terror. " (boldface added)

b. Promoting Democracy: Favorable Views
Michael Ignatieff/Democratic Providentialism/NYT Sunday Magazine/December 12 2004
"...it remains true that the promotion of democracy by the United States has proved to be a dependably good idea. America may be more unpopular than ever before, but its hegemony really has coincided with a democratic revolution around the world. For the first time in history, a majority of the world's peoples live in democracies. In a dangerous time, this is about the best news around, since democracies, by and large, do not fight one another, and they do not break up into civil war. As a result -- and contrary to the general view that the world is getting more violent -- ethnic and civil strife have actually been declining since the early 1990's, according to a study of violent conflicts by Ted Robert Gurr at the University of Maryland. Democratic transitions can be violent -- when democracy came to Yugoslavia, majority rule at first led to ethnic cleansing and massacre -- but once democracies settle in, once they develop independent courts and real checks and balances, they can begin to advance majority interests without sacrificing minority rights."

Michael McFaul/Democracy Promotion As A World Value/Washington Quarterly/Winter 2005 (pdf)
"... critics argue that the United States must abandon the ideological mission of democracy promotion, both in Iraq and throughout the world, and instead follow a more pragmatic, realist foreign policy if it is to regain its respect abroad and more effectively defend U.S. national interests.... Yet, this interpretation of the relationship between U.S. foreign policy and American popularity on the one hand and the status of democratic values in the international community on the other is misleading. First, democracy as an international norm is stronger today than ever, and democracy itself is widely regarded as an ideal system of government. Democracy also has near-universal appeal among people of every ethnic group, every religion, and every region of the world. Second, democracy promotion as a foreign policy goal has become increasingly acceptable throughout most of the international community."

Janine Di Giovanni/Democratic Vistas/NYT Sunday Book Review January 20, 2008  A review of Larry Diamond/The Spirit Of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World (Henry Holt 2008).

Uriya Shavit/The Road to Democracy in the Arab World/Azure Autumn 2006 No. 26
"To many,  this reality (the continuing war in Iraq and authoritarian regimes in the Arab world) is proof of a fundamental incompatibility between Western forms of government and Arab society.  In their view, liberal democracy (or anything approaching it) cannot possibly bloom on Arab soil, since Arab societies are so profoundly differerent than the West.  Thus, President Bush's gravest mistake - and the source of his democratization initiative's failure - lay in ignoring the uniqueness of Arab society and attempting to force an alien and unwanted form of government upon it.  According to this thinking, the fate of America's campaign in Iraq was sealed even before the first shot was fired.  ...
This essentialist view of Arab society, while commonplace in the West, is flawed.  In truth, there is nothing unique to Arab societies that results in a preference for despotic regines."

c. Promoting Democracy: Doubts & Criticism
Edward D. Mansfeld and Jack Snyder, "Prone to Violence", The National Interest Winter 2005-2006
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
"THE BUSH Administration has argued that promoting democracy in the Islamic world, rogue states and China will enhance America's security, because tyranny breeds violence and democracies co-exist peacefully. But recent experience in Iraq and elsewhere reveals that the early stages of transitions to electoral politics have often been rife with violence.

These episodes are not just a speed bump on the road to the democratic peace. Instead, they reflect a fundamental problem with the Bush Administration's strategy of forced-pace democratization in countries that lack the political institutions needed to manage political competition. Without a coherent state grounded in a consensus on which citizens will exercise self-determination, unfettered electoral politics often gives rise to nationalism and violence at home and abroad.

Absent these preconditions, democracy is deformed, and transitions toward democracy revert to autocracy or generate chaos. Pushing countries too soon into competitive electoral politics not only risks stoking war, sectarianism and terrorism, but it also makes the future consolidation of democracy more difficult."

Julian Sanchez/The Limits of Democratization: Will promoting democracy bolster national security?/reason.com/February 15 2005
This article contains a number of links to materials related to this topic.

Ian Buruma/An Islamic Democracy For Iraq?/NYT Sunday Magazine/December 05 2004
"Is Islamic democracy really possible?  Or is it something meaningless, like 'Jewish science', say, or contradictory, like 'people's democracy' under Communism?  This is the question that will determine the future of Iraq, ..."

Fareed Zakaria, "Islam, Democracy, & Constitutional Liberalism", Political Science Quarterly, Spring, 2004, Vol. 119.
“Although it is easy to impose elections on a country, it is more difficult to push constitutional liberalism on a society. The process of genuine liberalization and democratization, in which an election is only one step, is gradual and long term.
… the absence of free and fair elections should be viewed as one flaw, not the definition of tyranny. Elections are an important virtue of governance, but they are not the only virtue. It is more important that governments be judged by yardsticks related to constitutional liberalism. Economic, civil, and religious liberties are at the core of human autonomy and dignity. If a government with limited democracy steadily expands these freedoms, it should not be branded a dictatorship.”
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Gary J. Bass/Independence Gaze/NYT Sunday Magazine January 6, 2008
"Who deserves statehood?"

Gerard Alexander, "The Authoritarian Illusion", The National Interest, Fall, 2004, Issue 77.
"While it is true that several authoritarian societies have bred anti-Western extremism, many others have not. Sympathy for democracy does not constitute sufficient grounds for a sweeping policy of worldwide democratization.
...The United States does not require a fully democratic world in order to achieve security.  Indeed, the threats we currently face are generated by causes that transcend regime type."
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

d. Free Markets & Democracy
Patricia Cohen/An Unexpected Odd Couple: Free Markets and Freedom/NYT June 14, 2007
"From China, where astounding economic growth persists despite Communist Party rule, to Russia, where President Vladimir V. Putin has squelched opposition, to Venezuela, where dissent is silenced, developments around the world have been tearing jawbreaker-size holes in what has been a remarkably powerful idea, not only in academic circles but also in both Republican and Democratic administrations — that capitalism and democracy are two sides of a coin."

Hilton L. Root/Capitalism and Democracy/The American Interest, Vol. 3, No. 3, January-February 2008
A review essay on
Democracy's Good Name: The Rise and Risks of the World's Most Popular Form of Government by Michael Mandelbaum (Public Affairs 2007) and Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life by Robert B. Reich (Knopf 2007).
"
The expectation that market capitalism will create social foundations for the spread of Western-style democracy fails to anticipate the capture of weak democratic institutions in emerging states by wealthy minorities. Many of the business deals that benefit these wealthy minorities are fashioned from a combination of foreign policy and government power. They almost invariably involve what amounts to insider trading between government officials in the capital city, abetted by increasingly close connections and movements between domestic and transnational capital, often at the expense of the majority of people."
The full text of this article be viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.htmlScroll to the section on "American Foreign Policy" and look for the author and title of this review essay.  This location is password protected.  Password and user name for access will be provided to students in the course.

Return to beginning of syllabus.
Return to Overview of Course & Topics

IV. Interest Groups, Symbols & Communication, & Congress
PeterDreier&DickFlacks/Patriotism'sSecretHistory/TheNation/June3.2002
Robert Bonner/Star-SpangledSentiment/tcommon-place.org/vol-03/no-02/January2003
"It is worth considering why Americans have invested their flags with such importance and how the United States has become more saturated with patriotic color than any other country in the world. The comparative intensity of American loyalties is less noteworthy than the country's fixation on a single symbol, which has come to be associated with a remarkably wide range of emotions."

Samuel P. Huntington, "Dead Souls: The Denationalization of the American Elite", TheNational Interest, Spring 2004.
"The central distinction between the public and elites is not isolationism versus internationalism, but nationalism versus cosmopolitanism.
 . . .  Growing differences between the leaders of major institutions and the public on domestic and foreign policy issues affecting national identity form a major cultural fault line cutting across class, denominational, racial, regional and ethnic distinctions. In a variety of ways, the American establishment, governmental and private, has become increasingly divorced from the American people. Politically, America remains a democracy because key public officials are selected through free and fair elections. In many respects, however, it has become an unrepresentative democracy because on crucial issues--especially those involving national identity--its leaders pass laws and implement policies contrary to the views of the American people. Concomitantly, the American people have become increasingly alienated from politics and government."
This Huntington article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
Samuel P. Huntington's article "Dead Souls: ..." is also directly accessible @ http://americanfuture.net/?page_id=144.

Daniel Drezner/Mind the Gap/The National Interest/No. 87, Jan-Feb 2007
Why policymaking elites and foreigners alike distrust the judgment of Americans.
"When it comes to American foreign policy, U.S. policymakers and citizens from the rest of the world would not be expected to see eye to eye. They do, however, agree on one thing—they both mistrust how ordinary Americans think about international relations."

Walter Russell Mead/God's Country?: Evangelicals And Foreign Policy/Foreign Affairs September-October 2006, Vol. 85, No. 5.

Robert D. Kaplan/The Media & Medievalism/Policy Review/December 2004 & January 2005
"Like the priests of ancient Egypt, the rhetoricians of ancient Greece and Rome, and the theologians of medieval Europe, the media represent a class of bright and ambitious people whose social and economic stature gives them the influence to undermine political authority. Like those prior groups, the media have authentic political power — terrifically magnified by technology — without the bureaucratic accountability that often accompanies it, so that they are never culpable for what they advocate."

Daniel W. Drezner, "Foreign Policy Goes Glami", The National Interest, November 2007-December 2007, Issue 92. 
Abstract of Daniel W. Drezner/Foreign Policy Goes Gami/The National Interest/November 2007-December 2007, Issue 92
The full text of this article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library. A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required. (See LexisNexis.)

Matthew A. Baum, "Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public",  The American Political Science Review, March, 2002, Vol. 96, No. 1., pp. 91-109.
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
See also:
Matthew A. Baum/Soft News Goes to War : Public Opinion and American Foreign  Policy in the New Media Age (Princeton  2003)
The full text of Chapter I, "War and Entertainment" is accessible @
http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s7655.html.
   For a review of this book, see: Jakub Grygiel, Jakub Grykiel/A Fuzzy Picture/Harvard International Review  - From Harvard Symposia 59/Religion/Vol. 25 (4), Winter 2004

Lawrence R. Jacobs, Benjamin I. Page, "Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?", American Political Science Review, February 2005, Vol. 99, No. 1.
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
This article can also be viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.html. Scroll to section on "American Foreign Policy" and look for the author and title of this article.  This location is password protected.  Password and user name for access will be provided to students in the course.

Walter Russell Mead/Jerusalem Syndrome/Decoding"The Israel Lobby"/Foreign Affairs November-December 2007
This is a review essay on John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (2007).

"Rarely in professional literature does one encounter such a gap between aspiration and performance as there is in The Israel Lobby. Mearsheimer and Walt fail to define "the lobby" in a clear way. Their accounts of the ways in which it exercises power, as well as their descriptions of the power it wields, are incoherent. Their use of evidence is uneven. At the level of geopolitics, their handling of the complex realities and crosscurrents of the Middle East fails to establish either the incontestable definition of the national interest that their argument requires or the superiority they claim for the policies they propose."

Walter Russell Mead/The New Israel and the Old: Why Gentile Americans Back the Jewish State/Foreign Affairs July-August 2008
Summary:  The real key to Washington's pro-Israel policy is long-lasting and broad-based support for the Jewish state among the American public at large.
Note: While this essay focuses on American views, the author's reference to Israel as a "settler state" having "displaced" the local population with only a cursory discussion of the historic Jewish connection to the land, the continuing Jewish presence there, and the complex nature of land ownership and competing claims dating back to the period of Ottoman rule, is a serious shortcoming.  For a thorough study of land claims and ownership issues, see:
Hillel Cohen, Army of Shadows: Palestinian Collaboration with Zionism, 1917-1948 (University of California Press 2008 -translated from the 2004 original by Haim Watzman).
"... thousands of Palestinians did sell land to Jews, and people from the very heart of the national movement contacted Zionist activists and assisted them. To ignore this is to disregard an essential feature of the history of the Palestinian people and of Jewish-Arab relations in Mandatory Palestine ...". (
Hillel Cohen, Army of Shadows, p. 4.)
Walter Russell Mead's comparison of the the U.S. and Israel as "settler states" also ignores the diversity and complexity of the multiple identities of the local population, including Jews. 
See, for example:
Jonathan Wilson/Ancestral Journeys/NYT Sunday Book Review July 6, 2008 A review of Origins: A Memoir by Amin Maalouf (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008).
“Barely a hundred years ago, Lebanese Christians readily proclaimed themselves Syrian, Syrians looked to Mecca for a king, Jews in the Holy Land called themselves Palestinian ... and my grandfather Botros liked to think of himself as an Ottoman citizen,” he writes. “None of the present-day Middle Eastern states existed, and even the term ‘Middle East’ hadn’t been invented. The commonly used term was 'Asian Turkey'." (boldface added)
From Amin Maalouf's book.  See
Origins: A Memoir. Go to "Search inside this book" and type in the words "Jews in the Holy Land called themselves Palestinian" (without the quotation marks).  This line and the cited passage above are found on page 211 of Maalouf's book.  The passage is cited in Jonathan Wilson's NYT review of Maalouf's book.
For additional comment on John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, see: Gabriel Schoenfeld/Dual Loyalty and the ‘Israel Lobby'/Commentary November 2006.

John Mueller/The Iraq Syndrome: The Wars and Public Opinion/Foreign Affairs November-December 2005, Vol. 84, No. 6.
Christopher Gelpi and John Mueller/The Cost of War: How Many Casualties Will Americans Tolerate? - An Exchange/Foreign Affairs Janaury-February 2006, Vol. 85, No. 1.

Daniel Yankelovitch/Poll Positions: What Americans Really Think About U. S. Foreign Policy/Foreign Affairs September-October 2005, Vol. 84, No. 1.
Note: This link provides access to a preview of this article.  The complete text of this article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library.  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Norman J. Ornstein & Thomas E. Mann/When Congress Checks Out/Foreign Affairs/November-December 2006
Over the past six years, Congress' oversight of the executive branch on foreign and national security policy has virtually collapsed. Compounding the problem, the Bush administration has aggressively asserted executive prerogatives -- sometimes with dire consequences. The oversight problem must be fixed, ideally as part of a more fundamental effort to restore the balance between the two branches.

Leadership of Congress & Congressional Committees
Leaders in Senate & House:
http://www.congresslink.org/print_basics_110leaders.htm

Committees:
Senate
http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/committees/d_three_sections_with_teasers/committees_home.htm

http://foreign.senate.gov/
http://armed-services.senate.gov/
http://intelligence.senate.gov/

House of Representatives
http://www.house.gov/house/CommitteeWWW.shtml
http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/
http://armedservices.house.gov/
http://intelligence.house.gov/

V. The State Department
U.S. Department of State
http://www.state.gov/

VI. The Military
Patricia M. Shields, "Civil-Military Relations: Changing Frontiers", Public Administration Review, November-December 2006, Vol. 66, Issue 6, pp. 924-928.
An informative review essay on the changing dynamics of civil-military relations with insightful comparisons of various theoretical perspectives and the state of scholarly studies in this important area of the social sciences. 

This article by Patricia M. Shields can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.  This article can also be viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.htmlScroll to the section on "American Foreign Policy" and look for the author and title of this article.  (The title in the list of readings has been shortened to: "Civil-Military Relations".)  This location is password protected.  Password and user name for access will be provided to students in the course.

Robert D. Kaplan, "The Media & The Military",The Atlantic Monthly, November 2004.
The Kaplan article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library. A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Max Boot/The Paradox Of Military Technology/NewAtlantis/Number 14, Fall 2006
As we learned on September 11, 2001, and continue learning on the battlefields of Iraq, the most advanced weapons are hardly a perfect shield against other kinds of destructive power. Technological supremacy separates America from the rest of the world, and yet modern technology leaves America (and American troops) vulnerable to vicious groups and gangs armed with AK47s, car bombs, or portable WMDs. Max Boot argues that even as modern technology has increased America’s conventional military supremacy, this military edge may be subverted by determined radicals armed with new technologies of death.                                  

Victor Davis Hanson/Military Technology & American Culture/The New Atlantis/Spring 03
Max Boot/The New American Way of War/Foreign Affairs July-August 2003, Vol. 82, No. 4
Max Boot/The Struggle to Transform the Military/Foreign Affairs March-April 2005, Vol. 84, No. 2
Peter W. Singer/Outsourcing War/Foreign Affairs March-April 2005, Vol. 84, No.2
Note: This link for the Singer article provides access to a preview of this article.  The complete text of this article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library.  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.

Thomas L. McNaugher/The Real Meaning of Military Transformation: Rethinking the Revolution/Foreign Affairs/January-February 2007
A review essay of
Finding the Target: The Transformation of American Military Policy by Frederick W. Kagan, Encounter Books, 2006, and War Made New: Technology, Warfare, and the Course of History, 1500 to Today by Max Boot, Gotham Books, 2006.
(Former Secretary of Defense) Rumsfeld's mishandling of the Iraqi occupation has given the "revolution in military affairs" a bad name. But as Max Boot and Frederick Kagan point out in two new books, transformation is vital to any military's success -- and more important now than ever.
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
See also:
Robert D. Kaplan/What Rumsfeld Got Right/The Atlantic Monthly, July-August 2008
This article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
Thom Shanker/In Air Force Changes, Signs of an Overhaul/NYT, June 10, 2008

David H. Petraeus/Beyond the Cloister/The American Interest Vol. 2, No. 6, July-August 2007
Civilian graduate programs broaden a soldier's horizons.
 

Victor Davis Hanson/War-Making and the Machines of War/Commentary December 2006

"... radical transformations in military practice have marked Western history at least since Sparta and Athens squared off in the Peloponnesian war in the 5th century B.C.E."

This article can be accessed @
Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
 
Robert D. Kaplan/On Forgetting the Obvious/The American Interest Vol. 2, No. 6, July-August 2007  A society that believes in nothing will fight for nothing.

Frederick W. Kagan/The U. S. Military's Manpower Crisis/Foreign Affairs July-August 2006, Vol. 85, No. 4.
Note: This link provides access to a preview of this article.  The complete text of this article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library.  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr./The Guard's Turn to Surge/nationaljournal.com/December 14, 2007
Andrew Tilghman/The Army's Other Crisis: Why the best and brightest young officers are leaving/Washington Monthly December 2007
Robert D. Kaplan, "Hunting the Taliban in Las Vegas", The Atlantic Monthly, September, 2006.
The entire text of this article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library.  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
David Kahn/The Rise of Intelligence/Foreign Affairs September-October 2006, Vol. 85, No. 5.
"Modern militaries' obsession with intelligence gathering and evaluation would have bemused Caesar and Napoleon, since such behavior was rarely engaged in until recently. In the war on terrorism, intelligence is playing its greatest role yet, but even today, espionage and intelligence analysis will not be the decisive factors."
Note: This link provides access to a preview of this article.  The complete text of this article can be accessed @ Locating Periodicals @ Texas State University Library.  A valid Texas State University User Name and Password are required.
Keir Lieber & Daryl Press/The Rise of U. S. Nuclear Primacy/Foreign Affairs March-April 2006, Vol. 85, No. 2.
"Today, for the first time in almost 50 years, the United States stands on the verge of attaining nuclear primacy. It will probably soon be possible for the United States to destroy the long-range nuclear arsenals of Russia or China with a first strike. This dramatic shift in the nuclear balance of power stems from a series of improvements in the United States' nuclear systems, the precipitous decline of Russia's arsenal, and the glacial pace of modernization of China's nuclear forces. Unless Washington's policies change or Moscow and Beijing take steps to increase the size and readiness of their forces, Russia and China -- and the rest of the world -- will live in the shadow of U.S. nuclear primacy for many years to come."

U.S. Nuclear Primacy: A Debate-Does Washington Really Have (or Want) Nuclear Primacy/Foreign Affairs September-October 2006, Vol. 85, No. 5.

William J. Broad, David E. Sanger & Thom Shanker/U.S. Selecting Hybrid Designs for Warheads/NYT January 7, 2007
Yagil Henkin/Urban Warfare in Jenin: Lessons for the War on Terror/Azure Summer 2003, No. 15.
This article can also be viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.htmlScroll to section on "American Foreign Policy" and look for the author and title of this article.  This location is password protected.  Password and user name for access will be provided to students in the course.

Recommended:

Leslie Wayne/Free to a Good Country/NYT-Business Day, p. C1./October 31, 2006
"Across the world, the Pentagon has thousands of garages, hangars and sprawling lots to store all its jets, tanks and other weaponry. But, like most American households, it is cluttered with old, unused and unwanted things. And so the Pentagon runs a little-publicized giveaway and tag sale program to clean out its overstuffed attics and closets, bulging with the greatest weapons buildup since the Reagan era. The Pentagon also uses the Excess Defense Articles program, as it is called, to reward government friends and allies across the globe."

VII. Intelligence
Roberta Wohlstetter, "Cuba And Pearl Harbor: Hindsight And Foresight", Foreign Affairs, Vol. XLIII, July, 1965, pp. 691-707.
The full text html version of the Wohlstetter article, "Cuba And Pearl Harbor: Hindsight And Foresight", can be viewed @ http://www.arnoldleder.com/readings/index.htmlScroll to the section on "American Foreign Policy" and look for the title "Wohlstetter: Cuba and Pearl Harbor".  This location is password protected.  Password and user name for access will be provided to students in the course.

James Johnson & Robert Zarate, "Slow Pearl Harbor", The Weekly Standard, December 19, 2005, Vol. 11, Issue 14.
Kenneth M.Pollack, Spies, "Lies, and Weapons: WhatWentWrong", The Atlantic Monthly, February 2004.
"How could we have